green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,328, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1729 Jack Lindsey, of the Estate of Grace C. Lindsey, Deceased, Jack Lindsey, as Surviving Spouse of Grace C. Lindsey, Deceased v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.
See Randolph County v. Alabama Power Co., 784 F.2d 1067, 1072 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 878 , 93 L.Ed.2d 833 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Lindsey v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.
See Randolph County v. Alabama Power Co., 784 F.2d 1067, 1072 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 878 , 93 L.Ed.2d 833 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Romulus v. Anchorage School District
See Storrs v. Municipality of Anchorage, 721 P.2d 1146, 1150 (Alaska 1986) (citing Nichols for the proposition that under Alaska’s due process clause, police officer had right to hearing before termination), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 878 , 93 L.Ed.2d 832 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
North Slope Borough v. Barraza
(2×)
See Storrs v. Municipality of Anchorage, 721 P.2d 1146, 1148-51 (Alaska 1986) (engaging in separate analysis of the federal and Alaska constitutions), ce rt. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 878 , 93 L.Ed.2d 832 (1987). .
cited
Cited "see"
Lincoln National Life Insurance v. Silver
See Kolentus v. Avco Corp., 798 F.2d 949, 966 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 878 , 93 L.Ed.2d 832 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Nucor Corporation v. Aceros Y Maquilas De Occidente, S.A. De C.V.
See Kolentus v. Avco Corp., 798 F.2d 949, 955 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 878 , 93 L.Ed.2d 832 (1987) (citing W.H.
discussed
Cited "see"
Talbot v. Robert Matthews Distributing Co.
See Kolentus v. Avco Corp., 798 F.2d 949, 961 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 878 , 93 L.Ed.2d 832 (1987) (employer has duty to disclose certain information to employees); Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669, etc. v. NLRB, 676 F.2d 826 , 831 (D.C.Cir.1982) (unilateral change by employer of employees’ terms and conditions of employment); Brown, 680 F.Supp. at 1219 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Talbot v. Robert Matthews Distributing Company
See Kolentus v. Avco Corp., 798 F.2d 949, 961 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 878 , 93 L.Ed.2d 832 (1987) (employer has duty to disclose certain information to employees); Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669, etc. v. NLRB, 676 F.2d 826 , 831 (D.C.Cir.1982) (unilateral change by employer of employees' terms and conditions of employment); Brown, 680 F.Supp. at 1219 . 13 The plaintiffs correctly assert that the defendants must demonstrate that their case is one that the NLRB could legally decide in their favor.
discussed
Cited "see"
Witte v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough
See Storrs v. Municipality of Anchorage, 721 P.2d 1146, 1150-51 (Alaska 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 878 , 93 L.Ed.2d 832 (1987); Casey v. City of Fairbanks, 670 P.2d 1133, 1138 (Alaska 1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Roynat, Inc. v. Richmond Transportation Corp.
See Kolentus v. Avco Corp., 798 F.2d 949, 955 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 878 , 93 L.Ed.2d 832 (1987). 4 It is also undisputed that the need to apply foreign law in a case, although not conclusive, “point[s] toward dismissal” of a case on forum non conveniens grounds.
discussed
Cited "see"
MacHinists Automotive Trades District Lodge No. 190 v. Peterbilt Motors Co.
These are the types of claims to which the Garmon preemption doctrine was intended to apply.” (Parker v. Connors Steel Co. (11th Cir. 1988) 855 F.2d 1510, 1516-1517 , rehg. den. (1988) 864 F.2d 795 , cert. den. (1989) 490 U.S. 1066 [ 104 L.Ed.2d 631 , 109 S.Ct. 2066 ]; accord Kolentus v. Avco Corp. (7th Cir. 1986) 798 F.2d 949, 961 , cert. den. (1987) 479 U.S. 1032 [ 93 L.Ed.2d 832 , 107 S.Ct. 878 ] [“The plaintiffs’ common law fraud claim [regarding *1409 failure to provide accurate information about an impending plant closure] is indistinguishable from an unfair labor practice claim th…
discussed
Cited "see"
Carl Marks & Co. v. Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
See Slade v. United States of Mexico, 617 F.Supp. 351 , 355 & n. 12 (D.D.C.1985), aff'd mem., 790 F.2d 163 (1986), cert. denied, — U.S.—, 107 S.Ct. 878 , 93 L.Ed.2d 832 (1987); see also Schmidt v. Polish People’s Republic, 579 F.Supp. 23, 26 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 742 F.2d 67 (2d Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
JACKSON v. SPINNAKER INSURANCE COMPANY
See, e.g., Randolph County v. Alabama Power Co., 784 F.2d 1067, 1072 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 878 , 93 L.Ed.2d 833 (1987); Adalman v. Baker, Watts & Co., 807 F.2d 359 , 369–70 (4th Cir.1986).3 The purposes behind Rule 16 and the myriad local rules governing the narrowing of issues for trial, see, e.g., Rule 5, Local Rules of the Western District of Pennsylvania (evidence not disclosed in pretrial narratives generally not admissible at trial), are served by vesting this discretion in the trial judge.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Riordan v. Commonwealth Edison Co.
See, eg., Kolentus v. Avco Corp., 798 F.2d 949, 958 (7th Cir.1986) (where summary was merely outline of plan and stated that formal text of plan governed, court looked to plan in the event of a conflict), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 878 , 93 L.Ed.2d 832 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Captran Creditors' Trust v. McConnell (In re Captran Creditors' Trust)
See also, Kolentus v. Avco Corp., 798 F.2d 949 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 878 , 93 L.Ed.2d 832 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sample v. Diecks
See, e.g., Randolph County v. Alabama Power Co., 784 F.2d 1067, 1072 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 878 , 93 L.Ed.2d 833 (1987) (within trial judge’s discretion to exclude from trial matters not raised in pretrial order); Adalman v. Baker, Watts & Co., 807 F.2d 359, 369-70 (4th Cir.1986) (trial court's “broad discretion” not abused where court refused to allow witness to testify when witness was disclosed to opposing counsel only two days before trial).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sample v. Diecks
See, e.g., Randolph County v. Alabama Power Co., 784 F.2d 1067, 1072 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 878 , 93 L.Ed.2d 833 (1987) (within trial judge's discretion to exclude from trial matters not raised in pretrial order); Adalman v. Baker, Watts & Co., 807 F.2d 359, 369-70 (4th Cir.1986) (trial court's "broad discretion" not abused where court refused to allow witness to testify when witness was disclosed to opposing counsel only two days before trial).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Randolph County
v.
Alabama Power Co.
v.
Alabama Power Co.
No. 86-716.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1987.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.