green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edwards
See United States v. Bonner, 808 F.2d 864 (1st Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1006 , 107 S.Ct. 1632 , 95 L.Ed.2d 205 (1987) (failure to include address was a minor, technical omission that was not fatal to the warrant; the agents had previously conducted surveillance of the premises, knew precisely which house was lo be searched, and described it accurately and in detail). 171 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Barber v. State
(2×)
See id. at 571 (citing Mayes v. State, 816 S.W.2d 79 , 86-87 n. 4 (Tex.Crim.App.1991) and Mann v. State, 718 S.W.2d 741, 744 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), ce rt. denied, 481 U.S. 1007 , 107 S.Ct. 1633 , 95 L.Ed.2d 206 (1987)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Estrella
Accord United States v. Bonner, 808 F.2d 864, 868 (1st Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1006 , 107 S.Ct. 1632 , 95 L.Ed.2d 205 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re KTMA Acquisition Corp.
See Gipson, 797 F.2d at 226 (treating citation to case law as evidence of an ability to perform legal research and understanding of the law), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1007 , 107 S.Ct. 1633 , 95 L.Ed.2d 206 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walt Anthony Sturmoski, A/K/A Anthony W. Williams
See United States v. Bonner, 808 F.2d 864, 866-67 (1st Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1006 , 107 S.Ct. 1632 , 95 L.Ed.2d 205 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Gilmore v. State
See Mann v. State, 718 S.W.2d 741, 743-44 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied 481 U.S. 1007 , 107 S.Ct. 1633 , 95 L.Ed.2d 206 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Bratcher v. State
See Mann v. State, 718 S.W.2d 741, 744 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cer t. denied, 481 U.S. 1007 , 107 S.Ct. 1633 , 95 L.Ed.2d 206 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Runck
See also United States v. Bonner, 808 F.2d 864, 866 (1st Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1006 , 107 S.Ct. 1632 , 95 L.Ed.2d 205 (1987) (The test is whether the description of the place to be searched is sufficient “ ‘to enable the executing officer to locate and identify the premises with reasonable effort, and whether there is any reasonable probability that another premise might be mistakenly searched.’ ” Citations omitted.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lockhart v. State
(2×)
App.1991); see also Mann v. State, 718 S.W.2d 741, 744 (Tex.Cr.App. 1986), cert, denied, 481 U.S. 1007 , 107 S.Ct. 1633 , 95 L.Ed.2d 206 (1987); Albrecht v. State, 486 S.W.2d 97, 100 (Tex.Cr.App.1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Nocero
See e.g., Commonwealth v. Frey, 512 Pa. 557, 564 , 517 A.2d 1265, 1268 (1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1007 , 107 S.Ct. 1633 , 95 L.Ed.2d 206 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
A. L. Laboratories, Inc.
v.
North American Philips Corp.
v.
North American Philips Corp.
No. 86-1311.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 6, 1987.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 48 opinions | Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.