green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
14.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1998 ·
…the statute requires reversal if the jury is allowed to separate after the court's charge has been given unless the defendant consents
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
State v. Webb
Ed. 2d 726 (1984); but see State v. Palmer, 224 Neb. 282, 330-31 , 399 N.W.2d 706 (1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S. Ct. 206 , 98 L.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rojas v. State
(2×)
the statute requires reversal if the jury is allowed to separate after the court's charge has been given unless the defendant consents
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
LeBlanc v. State
where determinations as to questions of law have already been made on a prior appeal to a court of last resort, those determinations will be held to govern the case throughout all of its subsequent stages, including a re-trial and a subsequent appeal
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Hall
where determinations as to questions of law have already been made on a prior appeal to a court of last resort, those determinations will be held to govern the case throughout all of its subsequent stages, including a retrial and a subsequent appeal
cited
Cited "see"
Demetrius Avery Jackson, Jr. v. State of Alabama.
See Thompson v. State, 503 So.2d 871, 880-81 (Ala.Cr.App.1986), affirmed, 503 So.2d 887 (Ala.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 204 , 98 L.Ed.2d 155 (1987).”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reynolds v. State
See Snyder v. State, 893 So.2d 488 (Ala.Crim.App.2003).’ “11 So.3d at 302. “ ‘ “ “While this failure to object does not preclude review in a capital case, it does weigh against any claim of prejudice.’ Ex parte Kennedy, 472 So.2d [1106,] at 1111 [ (Ala.1985) ] (emphasis in original). ‘This court has concluded that the failure to object to improper prose-cutorial arguments ... should be weighed as part of our evaluation of the claim on the merits because of its suggestion that the defense did not consider the comments in question to be particularly harmful.’ Johnson v. Wainwri…
discussed
Cited "see"
Blackmon v. State
(2×)
See Rule 45A, Ala.R.App.P. “ ‘ “This court has concluded that the failure to object to improper prosecuto-rial arguments ... should be weighed as part of our evaluation of the claim on the merits because of its suggestion that the defense did not consider the comments in question to be particularly harmful.” ’ Kuenzel v. State, 577 So.2d 474, 489 (Ala.Crim.App.1990), aff'd, 577 So.2d 531 (Ala.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 886 , 112 S.Ct. 242 , 116 L.Ed.2d 197 (1991), quoting Johnson v. Wainwright, 778 F.2d 623 , 629 n. 6 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 201 , 98 L.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. State
See Rule 45A, Ala.R.App.P. "`This court has concluded that the failure to object to improper prosecutorial arguments ... should be weighed as part of our evaluation of the claim on the merits because of its suggestion that the defense did not consider the comments in question to be particularly harmful.'" Kuenzel v. State, 577 So.2d 474, 489 (Ala.Crim.App. 1990), aff'd, 577 So.2d 531 (Ala.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 886 , 112 S.Ct. 242 , 116 L.Ed.2d 197 (1991), quoting Johnson v. Wainwright, 778 F.2d 623 , 629 n. 6 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 201 , 98 L.Ed.2d 152 (198…
cited
Cited "see"
Gregory Agnew v. Blair J. Leibach
See Johnson v. Wainwrighi, 778 F.2d 623 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 201 , 98 L.Ed.2d 152 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Agnew, Gregory v. Leibach, Blair
See Johnson v. Wainwright, 778 F.2d 623 (11th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Moore v. Kinney
See State v. Palmer, 224 Neb. 282, 318-20 , 399 N.W.2d 706, 731-32 (1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 206 , 98 L.Ed.2d 157 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Windsor v. State
See Snell v. State, 290 Ark. 503 , 721 S.W.2d 628 (1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 (1987) (finding that testimony that merely cumulative cannot effect the substantial rights of a defendant).
discussed
Cited "see"
Clark v. State
See Rector v. State, 738 S.W.2d 235, 247 (Tex.Crim.App.1986) ( on direct appeal, court would not address appellant’s contention that Court erred in prior denial of motion for extension of time within which to file Out-of-Time Motion for New Trial, as appellant’s contention was in nature of motion for rehearing on court’s original order), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 202 , 98 L.Ed.2d 153 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Stevenson
See Granviel v. State, 723 S.W.2d 141, 146 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 205 , 98 L.Ed.2d 156 (1987). 67 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Oles v. State
(2×)
See Marquez v. State. 725 S.W.2d 217, 234 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 201 , 98 L.Ed.2d 152 (1987).
examined
Cited "see"
Stanley D. Lingar v. Michael Bowersox
(4×)
See 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 206 , 98 L.Ed.2d 157 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lingar v. Bowersox
(2×)
See 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 206 , 98 L.Ed.2d 157 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Gray v. State
See Marquez v. State, 725 S.W.2d 217, 239 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 201 , 98 L.Ed.2d 152 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tillman v. Cook
See Johnson v. Wainwright, 778 F.2d 623, 631 (11th Cir.1985) (evaluating challenged comments in light of “the rest of the prosecutor’s speech”), cert. denied 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 201 , 98 L.Ed.2d 152 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jordy v. State
See Granviel v. State, 723 S.W.2d 141, 146 (Tex.Crim.App.1986) (citing Miranda, 384 U.S. at 478 , 86 S.Ct. at 1630 , 16 L.Ed.2d at 726 ), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 205 , 98 L.Ed.2d 156 (1987). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Boyd
(2×)
See State v. Bobo, 727 S.W.2d 945 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 204 , 98 L.Ed.2d 155 (1987); State v. Workman, 667 S.W.2d 44 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 873 , 105 S.Ct. 226 , 83 L.Ed.2d 155 (1984); State v. Cone, 665 S.W.2d 87 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1210 , 104 S.Ct. 2400 , 81 L.Ed.2d 357 (1984); State v. Campbell, 664 S.W.2d 281 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 920 , 105 S.Ct. 302 , 83 L.Ed.2d 236 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cargill v. Turpin
(2×)
See Johnson v. Wainwright, 778 F.2d 623, 631 (11th Cir.1985) (evaluating challenged comments in light of "the rest of the prosecutor's speech"), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 201 , 98 L.Ed.2d 152 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. State
See Harris v. State, 738 S.W.2d 207, 224 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 207 , 98 L.Ed.2d 158 (1987)(if the evidence fails to show that an offense was committed or that the defendant was connected to the offense, then it is not evidence of an extraneous offense); Laca v. State, 893 S.W.2d 171, 186 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1995, pet. ref'd).
discussed
Cited "see"
Palmer v. Nebraska Supreme Court
See State v. Palmer, 224 Neb. 282, 322-331 , 399 N.W.2d 706, 733-38 (1986) (The proportionality review made under the requirements of Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 29-2521.01-03 is limited to a comparison of the facts and circumstances of the death penalty-imposed case under review with those of all applicable cases in which the death penalty as opposed to life imprisonment was imposed) cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 206 , 98 L.Ed.2d 157 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alexander v. State
(2×)
See Harris v. State, 738 S.W.2d 207, 220 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 207 , 98 L.Ed.2d 158 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Whitaker v. State
See Harris v. State, 738 S.W.2d 207, 220 (Tex.Crim.App. 1986), cert, denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 207 , 98 L.Ed.2d 158 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Harvey
See State v. Perry, 502 So.2d 543, 558-59 (La.1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 205 , 98 L.Ed.2d 156 (1987), reh. denied, 484 U.S. 992 , 108 S.Ct. 511 , 98 L.Ed.2d 511 (1987); State v. Copeland, 530 So.2d 526, 542-43 (La.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1091 , 109 S.Ct. 1558 , 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989), reh. denied, 490 U.S. 1077 , 109 S.Ct. 2092 , 104 L.Ed.2d 655 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Chambers
See State v. Lingar, 726 S.W.2d 728, 741 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 206 , 98 L.Ed.2d 157 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Martin
See State v. Perry, 502 So.2d 543 (La.1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 205 , 98 L.Ed.2d 156 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barber v. State
(2×)
See State v. Bobo, 727 S.W.2d 945, 956 (Tenn.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 204 , 98 L.Ed.2d 155 (1987); State v. Workman, 667 S.W.2d 44, 49 (Tenn.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 873 , 105 S.Ct. 226 , 83 L.Ed.2d 155 (1984); State v. Cone, 665 S.W.2d 87, 94 (Tenn.1984), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1210 , 104 S.Ct. 2400 , 81 L.Ed.2d 357 (1984); and State v. Campbell, 664 S.W.2d 281, 284 (Tenn.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 920 , 105 S.Ct. 302 , 83 L.Ed.2d 236 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Hilton v. State
See Harris v. State, 738 S.W.2d 207, 220 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), ce rt. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 207 , 98 L.Ed.2d 158 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Hull v. State
See Harris v. State, 738 S.W.2d 207, 220 (Tex.Crim.App.1986) cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 207 , 98 L.Ed.2d 158 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. West
See State v. LaGrand, 153 Ariz. 21 , 30 n. 4, 734 P.2d 563 , 572 n. 4 (prosecutor has discretion on what crimes to charge and prosecute), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 207 , 98 L.Ed.2d 158 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Workman v. State
See State v. Sparks, 727 S.W.2d 480 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 205 , 98 L.Ed.2d 156 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Smith
See State v. Lingar, 726 S.W.2d 728, 734 (Mo.banc), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 206 , 98 L.Ed.2d 157 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Williams
See State v. Perry, 502 So.2d 543, 559 (La. 1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 205 , 98 L.Ed.2d 156 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Salazar
(2×)
See State v. LaGrand, 153 Ariz. 21, 30 , 734 P.2d 563, 572 (“It is well established that no lesser included offense to felony murder exists because the mens rea necessary to satisfy the premeditation element of first degree murder is supplied by the specific intent required for the felony.”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 207 , 98 L.Ed.2d 158 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Harris v. State
See Thompson v. State, 503 So.2d 871, 880-881 (Ala.Cr.App.1986), affirmed, 503 So.2d 887 (Ala.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 204 , 98 L.Ed.2d 155 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Henderson v. State
See Harris v. State, 738 S.W.2d 207, 220 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 207 , 98 L.Ed.2d 158 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Charles Jess Palmer v. Harold Clarke, Warden of Nebraska State Penitentiary
See State v. Palmer, 224 Neb. 282 , 399 N.W.2d 706, 714-15 (1986) (Palmer III), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 206 , 98 L.Ed.2d 157 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Shaver v. State
See Snell v. State, 290 Ark. 503 , 721 S.W.2d 628 (1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Emile Pierre Duhamel v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
See Rector v. State, 738 S.W.2d 235, 242 (Tex.Ct.App.1986), cer t. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 202 , 98 L.Ed.2d 153 (1987) (court found that offense itself was compelling evidence that appellant acted deliberately in case where defendant abducted victim, isolated her from potential rescue, stripped her of her clothing and possibly sexually assaulted her before shooting her in the head).
cited
Cited "see"
Michael R. Hogan v. State of Iowa
See Hogan v. State, 103 Nev. 21 , 732 P.2d 422 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 201 , 98 L.Ed.2d 153 (1987).
examined
Cited "see"
Marvin Edwin Johnson v. Harry K. Singletary, Jr., Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
(4×)
See Johnson v. Wainwright (Johnson I), 806 F.2d 1479 , 1481 n. 5 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 205 , 98 L.Ed.2d 157 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. White
(2×)
See State v. LaGrand, 152 Ariz. 483, 490 , 733 P.2d 1066, 1073 (true proportionality review does not require an examination of particular types of cases), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 206 , 98 L.Ed.2d 157 (1987). “[T]he court excludes from the pool of potentially similar cases to be considered for comparative purposes any first-degree murder case in which the defendant originally received only a life sentence.” Pulaski, Capital Sentencing in Arizona: A Critical Evaluation, 1984 Ariz.St.L.J. 1, 51; see, e.g., Amaya-Ruiz, 166 Ariz. at 179 , 800 P.2d at 1287 (citing no first-degree …
cited
Cited "see"
Haney v. State
See Thompson v. State, 503 So.2d 871 (Ala.Cr.App.1986), aff'd, 503 So.2d 887 (Ala.1987), cert, denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 204 , 98 L.Ed.2d 155 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Randall v. State
See Rector v. State, 738 S.W.2d 235, 247 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct. 202 , 98 L.Ed.2d 153 (1987); Barber v. State, 737 S.W.2d 824, 830 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1091 , 109 S.Ct. 1559 , 103 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Thompson v. State
See, Thompson v. State , 503 So.2d 871 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986), aff'd , 503 So.2d 887 (Ala.), cert. denied [ 484 U.S. 872 ], 108 S.Ct. 204 [ 98 L.Ed.2d 155 ] (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marquez
v.
Texas Johnson v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Hogan v. Nevada Snell v. Arkansas Allen v. California Rector v. Texas South v. South Carolina Cantu v. Texas Jefferson v. Georgia Howard v. Nevada Byrd v. Missouri Thompson v. Alabama Bobo v. Tennessee Austin v. Tennessee Granviel v. Texas Sparks v. Tennessee Perry v. Louisiana Johnson v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections LaGrand v. Arizona Palmer v. Nebraska Lingar v. Missouri May v. Texas Harris v. Texas LaGrand v. Arizona Gray v. Virginia Pope v. Georgia Davis v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Hill v. Arkansas Christiansen v. Illinois Bush v. Florida Workman v. Tennessee Demps v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Bolender v. Florida McNish v. Tennessee Guinan v. Missouri Felde v. Butler, Warden Titone v. Illinois Banks v. Pennsylvania Brown v. Kemp, Superintendent, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center Williams v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Bates v. Florida Silagy v. Illinois Moore v. Oklahoma
v.
Texas Johnson v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Hogan v. Nevada Snell v. Arkansas Allen v. California Rector v. Texas South v. South Carolina Cantu v. Texas Jefferson v. Georgia Howard v. Nevada Byrd v. Missouri Thompson v. Alabama Bobo v. Tennessee Austin v. Tennessee Granviel v. Texas Sparks v. Tennessee Perry v. Louisiana Johnson v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections LaGrand v. Arizona Palmer v. Nebraska Lingar v. Missouri May v. Texas Harris v. Texas LaGrand v. Arizona Gray v. Virginia Pope v. Georgia Davis v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Hill v. Arkansas Christiansen v. Illinois Bush v. Florida Workman v. Tennessee Demps v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Bolender v. Florida McNish v. Tennessee Guinan v. Missouri Felde v. Butler, Warden Titone v. Illinois Banks v. Pennsylvania Brown v. Kemp, Superintendent, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center Williams v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Bates v. Florida Silagy v. Illinois Moore v. Oklahoma
No. 86-6765; No. 86-6845; No. 86-6855; No. 86-6865; No. 86-6878; No. 86-6880; No. 86-6887; No. 86-6904; No. 86-6933; No. 86-6937; No. 86-6941; No. 86-6953; No. 86-6978; No. 86-6983; No. 86-6989; No. 86-7005; No. 86-7015; No. 86-7022; No. 86-7040; No. 86-7061; No. 86-7074; No. 86-7082; No. 86-7103; No. 86-7112; No. 86-7114; No. 86-7129; No. 87-5011; No. 87-5025; No. 87-5029; No. 87-5033; No. 87-5040; No. 87-5042; No. 87-5089; No. 87-5098; No. 87-5100; No. 87-5117; No. 87-5139; No. 87-5152; No. 87-5192; No. 87-5203; No. 87-5215; No. 87-5258; No. 87-5268.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1987.
484 U.S. 872
Brennan, Marshall.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Criminal Appeals of T… (4) · Court of Appeals of Texas (2)
Lead Opinion
Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;
C. A. 11th Cir.;
Sup. Ct. Nev.;
Sup. Ct. Ark.;
Sup. Ct. Cal.;
Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;
Ct. Common Pleas of Lexington County, S. C-;
Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;
Sup. Ct. Ga.;
Sup. Ct. Nev.;
Ct. App. Mo., Eastern Dist.;
Sup. Ct. Ala.;
Sup. Ct. Tenn.;
Ct. Crim. App. Tenn.;
Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;
Sup. Ct. Tenn.;
Sup. Ct. La.;
C. A. 11th Cir.;
Sup. Ct. Ariz.;
Sup. Ct. Neb.;
Sup. Ct. Mo.;
Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;
Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;
Sup. Ct. Ariz.;
[*873] No. 86-7114. No. 86-7129. No. 87-5011. No. 87-5025. No. 87-5029. No. 87-5033. No. 87-5040. No. 87-5042. No. 87-5089. No. 87-5098. No. 87-5100. No. 87-5117. No. 87-5139. No. 87-5152. No. 87-5192. No. 87-5203. No. 87-5215. No. 87-5258. No. 87-5268.Sup. Ct. Va.;
Sup. Ct. Ga.;
Sup. Ct. Fla.;
Sup. Ct. Ark.;
Sup. Ct. 111.;
Sup. Ct. Fla.;
Ct. Crim. App. Tenn.;
C. A. 11th Cir.;
Sup. Ct. Fla.;
Sup. Ct. Tenn.;
Ct. App. Mo., Eastern Dist.;
C. A. 5th Cir.;
Sup. Ct. 111.;
Sup. Ct. Pa.;
Super. Ct. Ga., Butts County;
Sup. Ct. Fla.;
Sup. Ct. Fla.;
Sup. Ct. 111.; and
Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
Dissent
Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,
dissenting.
Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.