green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
11.7 score
“no prejudice exists if the jury could make individual guilt determinations by following the court's cautionary instructions, appraising the independent evidence against each defendant.”
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 40 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Shaheem Johnson
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
convictions should be sustained if it may be inferred from the verdicts that the jury meticulously sifted the evi- dence.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Randy Davis Hunt, United States of America v. Carl Cooper
no prejudice exists if the jury could make individual guilt determinations by following the court's cautionary instructions, appraising the independent evidence against each defendant.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Globe Newspaper Company, United States of America v. Edmund M. Hurley, Appeal of Globe Newspaper Company
the usefulness of releasing juror names appears to us highly questionable.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
X-Tra Art, Inc., a California Corporation Linda Weill v. Consumer Union of the United States
These rules apply not only to defamation actions, but to "all claims whose gravamen is the alleged injurious falsehood of a statement." Id. at 1042.
discussed
Cited "see"
(HC) Azevedo v. Pfeiffer
See Kitchens v. 20 Bowen, 825 F.2d 1337, 1341 (9th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 (1988) (holding that “the 21 critical question is not whether the state proceedings are still ‘ongoing’ but whether ‘the state 22 proceedings were underway before initiation of the federal proceedings’”). 23 Second, an important state interest is necessarily implicated in a criminal resentencing 24 proceeding. “[T]he States’ interest in administering their criminal justice systems free from 25 federal interference is one of the most powerful of the considerations that should influence a co…
discussed
Cited "see"
(HC) Sholl v. Atchley
See Kitchens 11 v. Bowen, 825 F.2d 1337, 1341 (9th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 (1988) (holding that 12 “the critical question is not whether the state proceedings are still ‘ongoing’ but whether ‘the state 13 proceedings were underway before initiation of the federal proceedings’”). 14 The other Younger factors are also satisfied.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Shaheem Johnson, United States of America v. Raheem Johnson
J.A. 833-34; see United States v. Porter, 821 F.2d 968, 972 (4th Cir.1987) (“No prejudice exists if the jury could make individual guilt determinations by following the court’s cautionary instructions, appraising the independent evidence against each defendant.”), cer t. denied, 485 U.S. 934 , 108 s.Ct. 1108, 99 L.Ed.2d 269 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Wilson
See United States v. Porter, 821 F.2d 968, 977 (4th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Perez
See United States v. Porter, 821 F.2d 968, 972 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 , 108 S.Ct. 1108 , 99 L.Ed.2d 269 (1988) (stating that "[it] has urged trial courts to avoid defining reasonable doubt unless requested to do so by the jury, because of the risk that the definition will create confusion and impermissibly lessen the required burden of proof”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Lee Williams, A/K/A Ty, United States of America v. Margaret Jones, A/K/A Barbara Green
See United States v. Porter, 821 F.2d 968 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams
See United States v. Porter, 821 F.2d 968 (4th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Cowan, A/K/A Wop, United States of America v. Alphonso White, A/K/A Poochie
See United States v. Heater, 63 F.3d 311, 320 (4th Cir.1994). 28 "[P]lea negotiations, in order to be inadmissible, must be made in negotiations with a government attorney or with that attorney's express authority." United States v. Porter, 821 F.2d 968, 977 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cowan
See United States v. Heater, 63 F.3d 311, 320 (4th Cir. 1994). "[P]lea negotiations, in order to be inadmissible, must be made in negotiations with a government attorney or with that attorney's express authority." United States v. Porter , 821 F.2d 968, 977 (4th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Rosenberg v. United States
See McSurely v. Hutchison, 823 F.2d 1002, 1004-05 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 (1988); Sevier v. Turner, 742 F.2d 262, 272 (6th Cir.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
William Joseph Bogard v. Ronald W. Mellish
See McSurely v. Hutchison, 823 F.2d 1002, 1004-05 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 (1988); Carroll v. Wilkerson, 782 F.2d 44, 45 (6th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 923 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Spurlock v. Demby
See Ruben v. Warren City Sch., 825 F.2d 977, 981 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bertoli
United States v. Simone, 14 F.3d 833, 839 (3d Cir.1994); see United States v. Edwards, *1098 823 F.2d 111, 116-17 , reh’g denied, 828 F.2d 772 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 , 108 S.Ct. 1109 , 99 L.Ed.2d 270 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Andrew Harriott, United States of America v. Andrew Harriott
See United States v. Porter, 821 F.2d 968, 975 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 , 108 S.Ct. 1108 , 99 L.Ed.2d 269 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
In re Dalby
See In re Ruben, 825 F.2d 977, 990-91 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Antonio Bautista, United States of America v. Roberto Orama, A/K/A Roberto Vargas, United States of America v. Pedro Silverio, United States of America v. Jose Ferreira
See United States v. Porter, 821 F.2d 968, 978 (4th Cir. 1987) (defendant cannot be sentenced under both a drug conspiracy conviction and the CCE statute), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Efraim Natanel A/K/A Efriam Natanel
Accord United States v. Porter, 821 F.2d 968, 971-72 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 , 108 S.Ct. 1108 , 99 L.Ed.2d 269 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Earl Sweeney, United States of America v. Gregory Rudolph Davis, A/K/A Rudy Davis, United States of America v. Frederick Allan Fleming, A/K/A Freddy Fleming
See United States v. Porter, 821 F.2d 968, 972 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Arthur G. Strissel, Jr.
See United States v. Porter, 821 F.2d 968, 975 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 , 108 S.Ct. 1108 , 99 L.Ed.2d 269 (1987); United States v. Dorta, 783 F.2d 1179, 1183 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 3274 , 91 L.Ed.2d 564 (1986); United States v. Keltner, 675 F.2d 602, 605-06 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 71 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
David N. Jones v. Anthony Frank, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
See McSurely v. Hutchinson, 823 F.2d 1002, 1005 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 (1988); Carroll v. Wilkerson, 782 F.2d 44, 45 (6th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 923 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Larouche
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Porter, 821 F.2d 968, 972 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 , 108 S.Ct. 1108 , 99 L.Ed.2d 269 (1988). 123 There was substantial overlap between the mail fraud and tax charges: (1) at least 50% of LaRouche's unreported personal income stemmed from mail fraud; (2) the need to prove the LaRouche Organization's structure and control was present in both cases; and (3) expenditures made on LaRouche's behalf helped prove both that lenders were not truthfully told about the availability of funds and that LaRouche indeed had personal taxable income.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. LaRouche
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Porter, 821 F.2d 968, 972 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 , 108 5.Ct. 1108, 99 L.Ed.2d 269 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Montgomery v. Jimmy's Tire & Auto Center, Inc.
See In re Ruben, 825 F.2d 977, 981-982 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 , 108 S.Ct. 1108 , 99 L.Ed.2d 269 (1988); Hicks v. Southern Maryland Health Systems Agency, supra, 805 F.2d at 1167 ; In re Itel Securities Litigation, 791 F.2d 672, 675 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1033 , 107 S.Ct. 880 , 93 L.Ed.2d 834 (1987); Gordon v. Heimann, 715 F.2d 531, 537-539 (11th Cir.1983); Sanctions, supra at 280-285. 7 IV We reverse the order imposing sanctions under Rule 11 and remand this case for further proceedings.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chaney v. Grigg (In re Grigg)
We believe that this discretion will support a denial of fees in cases in which a postjudgment motion unfairly surprises or prejudices the affected party.”); see also Ruben v. Warren City Schools, 825 F.2d 977, 981 (6th Cir. 1987), cert. denied 485 U.S. 934 , 108 S.Ct. 1108 , 99 L.Ed.2d 269 (1988) (observing that White grants district courts the discretion to entertain post-judgment fee requests and that in exercising such discretion, the court “should consider unfair surprise or prejudice to the affected party and the policy of avoiding piecemeal appeals.”) It should also be emphasized …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Village of Bensenville v. Federal Aviation Administration
(2×)
See, e.g., Kitchens v. Bowen, 825 F.2d 1337 (9th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 (1988).4 government was not free to burden religious exercise through less direct restraints than criminal sanctions or fines.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hartfield v. East Grand Rapids Public Schools
See, e.g., McSurely v. Hutchison, 823 F.2d 1002, 1004-05 (6th Cir.1987), cert.denied, 485 U.S. 934 , 108 S.Ct. 1107 , 99 L.Ed.2d 269 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
County of Orange v. McGraw-Hill Companies (In Re County of Orange)
See, e.g., Blatty v. New York Times Co., 42 Cal.3d 1033, 1042 , 232 Cal.Rptr. 542 , 728 P.2d 1177 (1986), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 , 108 S.Ct. 1107 , 99 L.Ed.2d 268 (1988) (intentional interference with prospective economic advantage subject to actual malice standard) (quoting Reader's Digest Ass’n v. Superior Court, 37 Cal.3d 244, 265 , 208 Cal.Rptr. 137 , 690 P.2d 610 (1986) (intentional infliction of emotional distress and “false light” invasion of privacy subject to actual malice standard)); Unelko Corp. v. Rooney, 912 F.2d 1049, 1057-58 (9th Cir.1990); Crane v. Art- *992 zona Repu…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michele E. Shepherd and Larue Graves v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.
See Shea, 795 F.2d at 1077-78 ; see, e.g., In re Ruben, 825 F.2d 977, 986 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 , 108 S.Ct. 1108 , 99 L.Ed.2d 269 (1988); see also Joseph, SANCTIONS § 27(A), at 436 (“a party cannot be taxed with the misconduct of his or her counsel absent evidence reflecting that the party participated in the misconduct”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Reid Morris, United States of America v. William Bryson Morton
See also United States v. Porter, 821 F.2d 968, 972 (4th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 (1988). 20 The Appellants contend that the district court lessened the government's burden in the jury's mind when it gave the instruction that "while the government's burden of proof is a strict or heavy burden, it is not necessary that the defendant's guilt be proved beyond all possible doubt." It does not appear that this instruction, taken as a whole, would measurably affect the burden on the government as perceived by the jury.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Herrera v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Porter, 821 F.2d 968 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 , 108 S.Ct. 1108 , 99 L.Ed.2d 269 (1988); United States v. Raimondo, 721 F.2d 476 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, Bello v. United States, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
John A. Healey, Michael S. Press v. Chelsea Resources, Ltd., Dominick & Dominick Securities, Inc. And Dominick & Dominick, Incorporated
See, e.g., In re Ruben, 825 F.2d 977, 985 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 , 108 S.Ct. 1108 , 99 L.Ed.2d 269 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schneider v. Trw, Inc.
Co., 654 F.2d 529 , 536 (9th Cir.1981) (per curiam) (citations omitted); see also Kitchens v. Bowen, 825 F.2d 1337, 1342 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 , 108 S.Ct. 1109 , 99 L.Ed.2d 270 (1988); Otto v. Heckler, 802 F.2d 337, 338 , amending 781 F.2d 754 (9th Cir.1986); Schultz v. Sundberg, 759 F.2d 714, 718 (9th Cir.1985) (per curiam). 45 In response to these arguments, my colleagues appear to advance the dubious proposition that a district court's decision to retain jurisdiction over pendent claims is essentially unreviewable so long as it does not violate article III--i.e., the fi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schneider v. TRW, Inc.
Co., 654 F.2d 529 , 536 (9th Cir.1981) (per curiam) (citations omitted); see also Kitchens v. Bowen, 825 F.2d 1337, 1342 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 , 108 S.Ct. 1109 , 99 L.Ed.2d 270 (1988); Otto v. Heckler, 802 F.2d 337, 338 , amending 781 F.2d 754 (9th Cir.1986); Schultz v. Sundberg, 759 F.2d 714, 718 (9th Cir.1985) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Lee Bolick
(2×)
See Henderson, 717 F.2d at 137 ("As a general rule a witness's credibility may not be rehabilitated unless it first has been challenged;" citing Fed.R.Evid. 608(a)(2)); see also United States v. Porter, 821 F.2d 968, 974 (4th Cir.1987) (citing with approval United States v. Hilton, 772 F.2d 783, 786 (11th Cir.1985), where the "fundamental evidentiary principle [that] evidence of a witness' truthful character is admissible only after character for truthfulness has been attacked" required the conclusion that "when the bolstering testimony goes to the character for truthfulness of the only witnes…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Diane Nelms v. Montgomery County Combined Health District, Richard A. Parsells, and Melanie Cutlip
See, e.g., In re Ruben, 825 F.2d 977, 987 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 (1988)
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Steven Leon Rolle
See also United States v. Porter, 821 F.2d 968, 978 (4th Cir.1987) (setting aside concurrent sentence for section 846 conviction because Congress did not intend an individual to be separately punished for violations of both sections 846 and 848), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 934 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lewis
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 86-6710.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 7, 1988.
485 U.S. 934
Published
Citer courts: Fourth Circuit (2) · First Circuit (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.