green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Anderson v. Resolution Trust Corp.
See Porto v. Armco, Inc., 825 F.2d.1274, 1276 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 937 , 108 S.Ct. 1114 , 99 L.Ed.2d 274 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bruce Albert White
See United States v. Potter, 830 F.2d 1049, 1052 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 937 , 108 S.Ct. 1114 , 99 L.Ed.2d 274 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Warren Eugene Wake
Likewise, “the fact that no handwriting analysis was done is not a bar to ... admission.” Id.; see United States v. Calbas, 821 F.2d 887 , 893 n. 4 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 937 , 108 S.Ct. 1114 , 99 L.Ed.2d 275 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
19 Employee Benefits Cas. 2168, Pens. Plan Guide P 23915v
See Porto v. Armco, Inc., 825 F.2d 1274 , 1276 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 937 , 108 S.Ct. 1114 , 99 L.Ed.2d 274 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hall v. State
See Bolton v. Tesoro Petroleum Corp., 871 F.2d 1266, 1275 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 823 , 110 S.Ct. 83 , 107 L.Ed.2d 49 (holding that district court did not err in conducting in camera interview of each juror because how best to gather information regarding alleged juror misconduct is a matter of trial court discretion); see also United States v. Calbas, 821 F.2d 887, 896 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 937 , 108 S.Ct. 1114 , 99 L.Ed.2d 275 (1988) (holding that district court acted properly in conducting limited inquiry into jury use of information outside of the record and …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jane L. Wheel v. Stuart Robinson, Superintendent of Chittenden County Correctional Center
Indeed, in United States v. Ianniello, 866 F.2d 540 (2d Cir.1989), we remanded for a Remmer posttrial hearing, and stated: “We leave it to the district court’s discretion to decide the extent to which the parties may participate in questioning the witnesses, and whether to hold the hearing in camera.” Id. at 544 ; see also United States v. Calbas, 821 F.2d 887, 896 (2d Cir.1987) (“we find no substance in Calbas’s suggestion that the district court acted improperly in conducting a limited inquiry and in failing to allow counsel to participate in the questioning of jurors” in a Rem-m…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mohammad Dawood Nusraty
United States v. DeNoia, 451 F.2d 979, 981 (2d Cir.1971) (per curiam); see also United States v. Calbas, 821 F.2d 887, 892 (2d Cir.1987) (evidence of defendant’s knowing involvement sufficient to support conspiracy conviction), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1114 , 99 L.Ed.2d 275 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Calbas
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 87-5806.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 7, 1988.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.