discussed Cited "see" Daughtry v. Dennehy Furthermore, in applying the Jackson standard, “explicit reference must be made to the substantive elements of the criminal offense as defined by state law.” Jackson, 443 U.S. at 324 n. 16, 99 S.Ct. at 2791 n. 16; see Campbell v. Fair, 838 F.2d 1, 4 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 847 , 109 S.Ct. 126 , 102 L.Ed.2d 100 (1988).

discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Doherty (2×) See Campbell v. Fair, 838 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 847 (1988).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Roy See United States v. Perez, 845 F.2d 100, 103-04 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Aranda-Rodriguez v. United States, 488 U.S. 847 , 109 S.Ct. 124 , 102 L.Ed.2d 98 (1988); United States v. Roman, 822 F.2d 261, 263-64 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 954 , 108 S.Ct. 347 , 98 L.Ed.2d 373 (1987); United States v. McCown, 711 F.2d 1441, 1446 (9th Cir.1983); United States v. Horton, 676 F.2d 1165, 1169 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1201 , 103 S.Ct. 1184 , 75 L.Ed.2d 431 (1983); United States v. Dennis, 625 F.2d 782, 793 (8th Cir.1980).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Stewart v. Coalter See also Ortiz, 19 F.3d at 717 (“standard must be applied “with specific reference to *468 the elements of the offense as defined by-state law'”) (quoting Campbell v. Fair, 838 F.2d 1, 4 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 847 , 109 S.Ct. 126 , 102 L.Ed.2d 100 (1988)).