green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.4 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"the police should not be taxed with having failed to cover every eventuality. . . . As long as police measures are not deliberately designed to invent exigent circumstances, we will not second-guess their effectiveness"
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"the police should not be taxed with having failed to cover every eventuality.... As long as police measures are not deliberately designed to invent exigent circumstance, we will not second-guess their effectiveness"
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Rico
But cf. United States v. Socey, 846 F.2d 1439 (D.C.Cir.) ("As long as the police measures are not deliberately designed to invent exigent circumstances, we will not second-guess their effectiveness."), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 858 , 109 S.Ct. 152 , 102 L.Ed.2d 123 (1988).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Govens
(2×)
the police should not be taxed with having failed to cover every eventuality. . . . as long as police measures are not deliberately designed to invent exigent circumstances, we will not second-guess their effectiveness
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Peterson
(2×)
the police should not be taxed with having failed to cover every eventuality.... as long as police measures are not deliberately designed to invent exigent circumstance, we will not second-guess their effectiveness
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David L. Wallace, Darrin Hicks, and Christopher Darren Morgan
See United States v. Socey, 846 F.2d 1439 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 858 (1988), cited in Radka, 904 F.2d at 362 . 34 Defendants also cite Ogbuh, 982 F.2d 1000 , for the proposition that the police cannot avoid a warrant by creating exigent circumstances.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dawkins
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Socey, 846 F.2d 1439 , 1444 n. 6 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 858 , 109 5.Ct. 152, 102 L.Ed.2d 123 (1988); see also United States v. Vaughn, 830 F.2d 1185, 1187 (D.C.Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
No. 91-3247
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Socey, 846 F.2d 1439 , 1444 n. 5 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 858 , 109 S.Ct. 152 , 102 L.Ed.2d 123 (1988); see also United States v. Vaughn, 830 F.2d 1185, 1187 (D.C.Cir.1987). 10 Although probable cause to arrest and probable cause to search have different emphases, the Supreme Court has set forth general principles that guide our approach to either inquiry.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harris
See United States v. Socey, 269 U.S.App.D.C. 453, 459 , 846 F.2d 1439, 1445 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 858 , 109 S.Ct. 152 , 102 L.Ed.2d 123 (1988); (Vance) Robinson, 174 U.S.App.D.C. at 353 , 533 F.2d at 580 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Smith
See United States v. Socey, 846 F.2d 1439, 1444-45 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 858 , 109 S.Ct. 152 , 102 L.Ed.2d 123 (1988); see also Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 770-71 , 86 S.Ct. 1826, 1835-36 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966) (exigent circumstances exist when evidence is likely to disappear).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. State
Illinois v. McArthur, 531 U.S. 326, 331-32 , 121 S.Ct. 946, 950 , 148 L.Ed.2d 838 (2001); Santana, 427 U.S. at 43 , 96 S.Ct. at 2410 , 49 L.Ed.2d 300 ; Schmerber, 384 U.S. at 770-71 , 86 S.Ct. at 1835-36 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 ; see also United States v. Socey, 846 F.2d 1439, 1444 (D.C.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 858 , 109 S.Ct. 152 , 102 L.Ed.2d 123 (1988); Stackhouse v. State, 298 Md. 203, 213-14 , 468 A.2d 333, 338-39 (1983). “[A]n entry in the absence of exigent circumstances is illegal.” Segura v. United States, 468 U.S. 796, 812 , 104 S.Ct. 3380, 3389 , 82 L.Ed.2d 599 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hilliard v. United States
However, the Court observed that it had "actually applied only the 'hot pursuit' doctrine to arrests in the home.” Welsh, 466 U.S. at 750 , 104 S.Ct. at 2097-98 ; see Santana, supra, 427 U.S. at 42-43 , 96 S.Ct. at 2409-10 ; see also United States v. Socey, 269 U.S.App.D.C. 453, 458-59 , 846 F.2d 1439, 1444-45 (outlining limited emergency situations excusing warrant requirement), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 858 , 109 S.Ct. 152 , 102 L.Ed.2d 123 (1988); United States v. Johnson, 256 U.S.App.D.C. 65, 68 , 802 F.2d 1459, 1462 (1986). 13 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Orville Reed, A/K/A Sonny Reed
See also United States v. Socey, 846 F.2d 1439, 1446 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 858 , 109 S.Ct. 152 , 102 L.Ed.2d 123 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alan Radka
(2×)
See e.g., United States v. Socey, 846 F.2d 1439, 1445 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 858 , 109 S.Ct. 152 , 102 L.Ed.2d 123 (1988); United States v. Johnson, 802 F.2d 1459, 1462 (D.C.Cir.1986); United States v. Rubin, 474 F.2d 262, 268-69 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 833 , 94 S.Ct. 173 , 38 L.Ed.2d 68 (1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tripati
v.
Brimmer
v.
Brimmer
No. 88-5056.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1988.
488 U.S. 858
Published
Citer courts: Superior Court of Pennsylvania (4)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.