green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.5 score
“spawr ii”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Karn v. U.S. Department of State
See United States v. Spawr Optical Research, Inc., 864 F.2d 1467 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 809 , 110 S.Ct. 51 , 107 L.Ed.2d 20 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darlene SPAN; Jerry Span, Defendants-Appellants
See United States v. Spawr Optical Research, Inc., 864 F.2d 1467, 1470 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 809 , 110 S.Ct. 51 , 107 L.Ed.2d 20 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Richard H. Krantz v. Phillip Briggs, Superintendent, Cook Inlet Pretrial Facility, Alaska Department of Corrections
See United States v. Spawr Optical Research, Inc., 864 F.2d 1467, 1470 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 809 , 110 S.Ct. 51 , 107 L.Ed.2d 20 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Abdelkader Helmy, United States of America v. James E. Huffman
See United States v. Spawr Optical Research Inc., 864 F.2d 1467, 1472-78 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 809 , 110 S.Ct. 51 , 107 L.Ed.2d 20 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Villeda Aldana v. Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc.
See, e.g., Steelworkers v. Phelps Dodge Corp., 865 F.2d 1539, 1545 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 809 , 110 S.Ct. 51 , 107 L.Ed.2d 20 (1989) (finding joint action established by common mission between private employer and local law enforcement officers to violate striker’s rights); Eastman Kodak, 978 F.Supp. at 1091 (conspiracy with Bolivian state judicial actors to keep Plaintiff in detention to extract a settlement).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Community Publishers, Inc. v. Donrey Corp.
See also, United States v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co., 866 F.2d 242, 246 (8th Cir.1988) (“The lawfulness of an acquisition turns' on the purchaser’s potential for creating, enhancing, or facilitating the exercise of market power— the ability of one or more firms to raise prices above competitive levels for a significant period of time.”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 809 , 110 S.Ct. 51 , 107 L.Ed.2d 20 (1989); Merger Guidelines § 0.1 (“the unifying theme ... is that mergers should not be permitted to create or enhance market' power or to facilitate its exercise”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
D.S.A. v. Circuit Court Branch 1, Rock County Juvenile Probation Department, John Whitcomb and Donald Hanaway
See, e.g., United States v. Spawr Optical Research, Inc., 864 F.2d 1467, 1470 (9th Cir.1988) (Court in Lane "emphasized that the petition would not have been moot if the petitioner had challenged the conviction itself."), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 51 , 107 L.Ed.2d 20 (1989); Vandenberg v. Rodgers, 801 F.2d 377, 378 (10th Cir.1986) (finding petitioner's appeal moot under Lane because petitioner failed to attack underlying conviction; "[t]hus, this case is distinguishable from decisions rejecting a claim of mootness because a petitioner faces continuing negative consequences as a result …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation. State of Arizona v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Atlantic Richfield Co. Exxon Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. And Shell Oil Co., and Continental Oil Co. Gulf Oil Corp. Phillips Petroleum Co. Caribou Four Corners, Inc. And Powerine Oil Co., State of California v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Exxon Corp. Gulf Oil Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. And Shell Oil Co., and Atlantic Richfield Co. Getty Oil Co. And Phillips Petroleum Co., State of Oregon, on Behalf of Itself, Its Residents and All Political Subdivisions Within the State Similarly Situated v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Atlantic Richfield Co. Exxon Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. And Shell Oil Co., and Getty Oil Co. Gulf Oil Corp. And Phillips Petroleum Co., State of Washington, on Behalf of Itself and Its Public Entities and Residents v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Atlantic Richfield Co. Exxon Corp. Gulf Oil Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. Shell Oil Co., and Getty Oil Co. And Phillips Petroleum Co.
Elec., 809 F.2d at 631 ; see also United Steelworkers of America v. Phelps Dodge Corp., 865 F.2d 1539, 1542 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 51 , 107 L.Ed.2d 20 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Arizona v. Standard Oil Co.
Elec., 809 F.2d at 631 ; see also United Steelworkers of America v. Phelps Dodge Corp., 865 F.2d 1539, 1542 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 51 , 107 L.Ed.2d 20 (1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
O'Brien
v.
Stein
v.
Stein
No. 88-1713.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1989.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2)
Ct. App. Ohio, Franklin County. Certiorari denied.