discussed Cited "see" UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert John COLLINS, Defendant-Appellant “In order to determine whether the sentencing error is harmless, we must ‘look to the record, in particular the district court’s sentencing remarks, to determine whether the district court would have imposed the same sentence absent the erroneous factor.’ ” United States v. Robinson, 63 F.3d 889, 891 (9th Cir.1995) (quoting United States v. Rodriguez-Razo, 962 F.2d 1418, 1423 (9th Cir.1992)); see United States v. Munster-Ramirez, 888 F.2d 1267, 1273 (9th Cir.1989) (holding that we decline to review the sentence adjustment of a district court if it could not affect the sentence impose…

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Lewis Manuel Boles See United States v. Munster-Ramirez, 888 F.2d 1267, 1269 (9th Cir.1989) (applying clear error standard to determination of section 4B1.3's former requirement that defendant "derived a substantial portion of his income" from criminal conduct), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 920 (1990). 8 The presentence report indicates that the U.S. Postal Service suffered twenty-two thefts of mail from Postal Service vehicles over the course of the twelve months preceding Boles' arrest.