green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
11.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases ·
…we overruled the exception discussed in willis more than ten years ago.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Daniel Wayne Bensend A/K/A Daniel W. Bensend v. State
we overruled the exception discussed in willis more than ten years ago.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Daniel Wayne Bensend A/K/A Daniel W. Bensend v. State
we overruled the exception discussed in willis more than ten years ago.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Estrada
(2×)
See United States v. Silkwood, 893 F.2d 245, 247-49 (10th Cir. 1989) (noting a criminal defendant had a right to self-representation when the defendant requested self-representation after the guilt phase of the trial), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 908 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Doran Dee Robinson
See United States v. Gooden, 892 F.2d 725, 729 (8th Cir. 1989) ("The nature of the offense of conspiracy with its necessary aspect of secrecy often requires that the agreement be implied from the surrounding circumstances."), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 908 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Doran Dee Robinson, Also Known as Dee Robinson
See United States v. Gooden, 892 F.2d 725, 729 (8th Cir.1989) (“The nature of the offense of conspiracy with its necessary aspect of secrecy often requires that the agreement be implied from the surrounding circumstances.”), cer t. denied, 496 U.S. 908 , 110 S.Ct. 2594 , 110 L.Ed.2d 274 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trujillo v. State
Nelson, 934 P.2d at 1241 ; see United States v. Silkwood, 893 F.2d 245, 249 (10th Cir.1989), cert denied Silkwood v. United States, 496 U.S. 908 , 110 S.Ct. 2593 , 110 L.Ed.2d 274 (1990) (where the court remanded for re-sentencing after finding that defendant had been deprived of his right to counsel at sentencing).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Darrell L. Frech and Sally M. Frech, (w.d.okla.)
See United States v. Silkwood, 893 F.2d 245, 248 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 908 , 110 S.Ct. 2593 , 110 L.Ed.2d 274 (1990); cf. Taylor, 113 F.3d at 1140 ("[A] refusal without good cause to proceed with able appointed counsel is a 'voluntary' waiver." (citation omitted)). 6 Although the Sixth Amendment provides defendants with the right to counsel in criminal cases, defendants who are appointed counsel are not entitled to counsel of their own choosing.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frech
See United States v. Silkwood, 893 F.2d 245, 248 (10th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 908 (1990); cf. Taylor, 113 F.3d at 1140 (“[A] refusal without good cause to proceed with able appointed counsel is a ‘voluntary’ waiver.” (citation omitted)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael Jenner v. Joe Class
See United States v. Fuller, 887 F.2d 144, 147-48 (8th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 908 (1990). 3 Jenner also argues that the trial court erred in admitting testimony of a witness that Elliott asked the witness to retrieve Elliott's gun from the trash and to get a shovel to bury the body.
cited
Cited "see"
Michael Jenner v. Joe Class, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary Mark W. Barnett, South Dakota Attorney General
See United States v. Fuller, 887 F.2d 144, 147-48 (8th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 908 , 110 S.Ct. 2592 , 110 L.Ed.2d 273 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Emerson v. Gramley
See People v. Harris, 132 Ill.2d 366 , 138 Ill.Dec. 620, 631 , 547 N.E.2d 1241, 1252 (1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 908 , 110 S.Ct. 2594 , 110 L.Ed.2d 275 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cecil Eugene Ballew, A/K/A Eugene Ballew
(2×)
See United States v. Gooden, 892 F.2d 725, 727-28 (8th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 908 , 110 S.Ct. 2594 , 110 L.Ed.2d 274 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dennis B. Sather, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Fuller, 887 F.2d 144, 148 (8th Cir.1989) (plain error standard), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 908 , 110 S.Ct. 2592 , 110 L.Ed.2d 273 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Perry Duggan
See United States v. Gooden, 892 F.2d 725, 728-29 (8th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 908 (1990). 5 Accordingly, we affirm. * The HONORABLE JOHN W.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles W. Richards
See United States v. Fuller, 887 F.2d 144, 147 (8th Cir.1989) (drug paraphernalia admissible to prove motive because of the "close and well-known connection between firearms and drugs"), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 908 , 110 5.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fred Leon Barney, United States of America v. Clyde Trombley
See United States v. Silkwood, 893 F.2d 245, 249-250 (10th Cir.1989) (defining burglary for purposes of the enhancement provision), ce rt. denied, 496 U.S. 908 , 110 S.Ct. 2593 , 110 L.Ed.2d 274 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph P. Balano, Also Known as Joe Pat
See, e.g., United States v. Lewis, 987 F.2d 1349, 1356 (8th Cir.1993), and United States v. Gooden, 892 F.2d 725, 728-29 (8th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 908 , 110 S.Ct. 2594 , 110 L.Ed.2d 274 (1990) (standard of review with respect to conclusions on relevant conduct in general); see also United States v. Redlin, 983 F.2d 893, 897 (8th Cir.1993) (standard of review with respect to conclusions on same course of conduct), and United States v. Payne, 940 F.2d 286, 293 (8th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 616 , 116 L.Ed.2d 638 (1991), 112 S.Ct. 1589 (1992) (standard of revie…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ricciardelli
Cir.) (finding that consent does not cure an unlawful seizure), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 880 (1990); see also United States v. Twomey, 884 F.2d 46, 50-51 (1st Cir. 1989) (identifying criteria helpful in determining voluntariness of consent), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 908 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ricciardelli
Cir.) (finding that ______ ______ consent does not cure an unlawful seizure), cert. denied, 498 _____ ______ U.S. 880 (1990); see also United States v. Twomey, 884 F.2d 46 , ___ ____ _____________ ______ 50-51 (1st Cir. 1989) (identifying criteria helpful in determining voluntariness of consent), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 908 _____ ______ (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Steven Ricciardelli
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Maragh, 894 F.2d 415, 419-20 (D.C.Cir.) (finding that consent does not cure an unlawful seizure), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 880 , 111 S.Ct. 214 , 112 L.Ed.2d 174 (1990); see also United States v. Twomey, 884 F.2d 46, 50-51 (1st Cir.1989) (identifying criteria helpful in determining voluntariness of consent), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 908 , 110 S.Ct. 2592 , 110 L.Ed.2d 273 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frank Christian Nichols, United States of America v. Michael Chambliss
See, e.g., United States v. Gooden, 892 F.2d 725, 728 (8th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 908 , 110 S.Ct. 2594 , 110 L.Ed.2d 274 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Green
See, e.g., People v. Harris (1989), 132 Ill. 2d 366 , 547 N.E.2d 1241 , cert. denied (1990), 496 U.S. 908 , 110 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Twomey
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 89-6101.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 4, 1990.
496 U.S. 908
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Texas (2)
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.