green
Positive treatment
7.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Gamble
See State v. Flanders, 214 Conn. 493, 504-505 , 572 A.2d 983 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901 , 111 S. Ct. 260 , 112 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Kennedy v. United States
See Richardson v. Henry, 902 F.2d 414, 417 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901 (1990); Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691 F.2d 209, 213 (5th Cir. 1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Parker
See United States v. Schwartz, 899 F.2d 243, 246 (3rd Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901 , 111 S.Ct. 259 , 112 L.Ed.2d 217 (1990) (bank fraud); United States v. Berardi 675 F.2d 894, 897 (7th Cir.1982) (obstruction of justice); United States v. Droms, supra, at 363 (falsifying financial statements to IRS); United States v. Carson, 464 F.2d 424, 435 (2d Cir.) (conspiracy committed by alternate means not duplicitous), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 268 , 34 L.Ed.2d 219 (1972); United States v. Wesley, 918 F.Supp. 81, 86 (W.D.N.Y.1996) (receipt or possession of a firearm by a felon in v…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Cansler
See State v. Flanders, 214 Conn. 493 , 500 n.4, 572 A.2d 983 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901 , 111 S. Ct. 260 , 112 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Pedraza v. Jones
See Richardson v. Henry, 902 F.2d 414, 417 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901 , 111 S.Ct. 260 , 112 L.Ed.2d 218 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gerald Branch-Bey v. Neal Caauwe and Otto Soyk
See Richardson v. Henry, 902 F.2d 414, 416 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901 (1990), and cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1069 (1991). 5 The appellant's failure to provide a transcript in the record on appeal, makes it impossible for us to engage in meaningful review.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Coleman
Id.; see Richardson v. Henry, 902 F.2d 414, 416 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901 (1990) and 498 U.S. 1069 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Goldberg
See United States v. Jenkins, 901 F.2d 1075, 1084 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901 , 111 S.Ct. 259 , 112 L.Ed.2d 216 (1990). 11 Jenkins pertained to the sentencing of a bank security guard for bank larceny involving stolen stock certificates.
discussed
Cited "see"
Andrade v. Moran, etc.
See Richardson v. Henry, 902 F.2d 414, 416 (5th Cir.) (court ___ __________ _____ would dismiss pro se appeal concerning his sufficiency of the evidence claim despite plaintiff's inability to afford a transcript), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901 (1990); Thomas v. _____________ ______ Computax Corp., 631 F.2d 139, 142-43 (9th Cir. 1980) ________________ (inability to pay for transcript does make it "unavailable" within the meaning of Rule 10(c) which allows plaintiff to prepare a statement of evidence based on his or her recollection; court dismissed appeal).
discussed
Cited "see"
Andrade v. Moran, etc.
See Richardson v. Henry, 902 F.2d 414, 416 (5th Cir.) (court would dismiss pro se appeal concerning his sufficiency of the evidence claim despite plaintiff's inability to afford a transcript), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901 (1990); Thomas v. Computax Corp., 631 F.2d 139, 142-43 (9th Cir. 1980) (inability to pay for transcript does make it "unavailable" within the meaning of Rule 10(c) which allows plaintiff to prepare a statement of evidence based on his or her recollection; court dismissed appeal). 10 Plaintiff has not renewed his request for a transcript in this court nor has he appealed the dis…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eugene Britton
See United States v. Schwartz, 899 F.2d 243, 246 (3d Cir.) (distinguishing §§ 1344(a)(1) and 1344(a)(2)), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901 , 111 S.Ct. 259 , 112 L.Ed.2d 217 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Douglas James Hord
See Schwartz, 899 F.2d at 248 (holding each deposit of worthless checks into account at single bank to be separate execution of single scheme), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901 , 111 S.Ct. 259 , 112 L.Ed.2d 217 (1990); United States v. Poliak, 823 F.2d 371, 372 (9th Cir.1987) (holding writing of ten separate checks in check-kiting scheme to be ten separate executions of scheme to defraud three banks), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1029 , 108 S.Ct. 1586 , 99 L.Ed.2d 901 (1988), cited with approval in Lemons, 941 F.2d at 317 & n. 5.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dwayne Hess
See United States v. Jenkins, 901 F.2d 1075, 1083-84 (11th Cir.) (face value of stock certificates), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901 (1990). 8 Hess argues that his was a partially completed offense because not all the money orders were imprinted or cashed, and that the district court should have treated it as an attempt and given him a three-level reduction under section 2X1.1(b)(1).
cited
Cited "see"
Flanders v. Meachum
See State v. Flanders, 214 Conn. 493, 496-498, 572 A.2d 983 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901 , 111 S.Ct. 260 , 112 L.Ed.2d 217 (1990). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Boles
See State v. Flanders, 214 Conn 493, 501, 572 A.2d 983 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901 , 111 S. Ct. 260 , 112 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hinton
See, e.g., State v. Flanders, 214 Conn. 493, 505 , 572 A.2d 983 (defendant could be found guilty of felony murder if state proved defendant or participant caused victim’s death), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901 , 111 S. Ct. 260 , 112 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Connecticut Natural Gas Corp. v. Miller
See State v. Lopez, 235 Conn. 487 , 489 n.1, 668 A.2d 360 (1995); see also State v. Flanders, 214 Conn. 493 , 500 n.4, 572 A.2d 983 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901 , 111 S. Ct. 260 , 112 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Terrance Lenair Johnson
Powell v. Estelle, 959 F.2d 22, 26 (5th Cir.1992); see also Richardson v. Henry, 902 F.2d 414, 416 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901 , 111 S.Ct. 260 , 112 L.Ed.2d 218 (1990). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stephen Lucas, Cross-Appellee
See also United States v. Schwartz, 899 F.2d 243, 248 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901 (1990); United States v. Barnhart, 979 F.2d 647, 651 (8th Cir.1992); United States v. Lilly, 983 F.2d 300, 304 (1st Cir.1992) (overturning conviction, but noting that, in refusing to apply check kiting cases because of different facts, "each check signifies a separate issuance of money or credit on the part of the victimized bank."). 32 Bailey drew each check in an amount that not only hid the previous check but also added additional funds to the amount taken.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harriet Rimell, United States of America v. Albert Rimell
See, e.g., United States v. Schwartz, 899 F.2d 243, 248 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901 , 111 S.Ct. 259 , 112 L.Ed.2d 217 (1990); United States v. Poliak; 823 F.2d 371, 372 (9th Cir.1987) (each check written in a cheek-kiting scheme may be charged as a separate count of bank fraud), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1029 , 108 S.Ct. 1586 , 99 L.Ed.2d 901 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William W. Lilly
See, e.g., United States v. Schwartz, 899 F.2d 243, 248 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901 , 111 S.Ct. 259 , 112 L.Ed.2d 217 (1990); United States v. Poliak, 823 F.2d 371, 372 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1029 , 108 S.Ct. 1586 , 99 L.Ed.2d 901 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Conway
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 90-5134.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1990.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.