green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.1 score
“the government need not produce direct proof of scienter in a fraud case, however; circumstantial evidence of criminal intent can suffice”
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Cary v. Cox
the government need not produce direct proof of scienter in a fraud case, however; circumstantial evidence of criminal intent can suffice
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walters
See United States v. Hawkins, 905 F.2d 1489 , 1493 n. 1 (11th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 1038 , 111 S.Ct. 707 , 112 L.Ed.2d 696 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Turner v. Johnson
See United States v. Gallardo, 915 F.2d 149, 151 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1038 , 111 S.Ct. 707 , 112 L.Ed.2d 696 (1991) (mailing four separate envelopes containing child pornography constitutes four separate offenses).
cited
Cited "see"
Brodersen v. Sioux Valley Memorial Hospital
See [United States v.] Hawkins, 905 F.2d [1489,] 1494 [(11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1038 , 111 S.Ct. 707 , 112 L.Ed.2d 696 (1991) ].
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Allan Ross
(2×)
See United States v. Hawkins, 905 F.2d 1489, 1493 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1038 , 111 S.Ct. 707 , 112 L.Ed.2d 696 (1991). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Francisco Fernando Reyes, Fernando F. Reyes, Berta Lucia Osario De Reyes and Rafael Reyes, Jeffrey Stein
See United States v. Hawkins, 905 F.2d 1489, 1495 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1038 , 111 S.Ct. 707 , 112 L.Ed.2d 696 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gilliam v. State
See Proctor v. United States, 729 F.Supp. 473, 476 (D.Md.) (rejecting ineffective assistance of counsel claim where presentation of evidence defendant claimed was “vital” would have merely been cumulative), aff'd sub nom. 911 F.2d 721 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1038 , 111 S.Ct. 707 , 112 L.Ed.2d 697 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Scott McCurdy United States of America v. Pamela McCurdy
See United States v. Hawkins, 905 F.2d 1489 , 1493 n. 1 (11th Cir.1990) (underlying purpose of informing trial judge of possible errors so that he may have an opportunity to correct them is served where at least one of two or more defense counsel raises an objection), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 707 , 112 L.Ed.2d 696 (1991). 15 On the other hand, a district judge should not have to guess at defense strategy.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jimmy Lee Church
See United States v. Hawkins, 905 F.2d 1489 , 1493 n. 1 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 707 , 112 L.Ed.2d 696 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert C. Jacoby and Thomas Skubal
See United States v. Hawkins, 905 F.2d 1489, 1494 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 707 , 112 L.Ed.2d 696 (1991); EEOC v. Alton Packaging Corp., 901 F.2d 920 ; 926 (11th Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Labean
See also United States v. Gallardo, 915 F.2d 149 (5th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 1038 , 111 S.Ct. 707 , 112 L.Ed.2d 696 (1991) (affirming sentence of consecutive six-year terms of imprisonment per violation for simultaneously placing three letters in the mail that contained pornographic photographs, constituting three separate violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2252 (a)(1)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oken v. State
(2×)
Gilliam II, 331 Md. at 678-80 , 629 A.2d at 699-700 (rejecting claim of ineffective assistance of counsel where evidence not presented was cumulative); see also Proctor v. United States, 729 F.Supp. 473, 476 (D.Md.) (rejecting ineffective assistance of counsel claim where evidence would have been merely cumulative, notwithstanding defendant's claim that evidence was `vital'), aff'd sub. nom., Epps v. United States, 911 F.2d 721 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1038 , 111 S.Ct. 707 , 112 L.Ed.2d 697 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Knotts v. State
See also United States v. Hawkins, 905 F.2d 1489 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1038 , 111 S.Ct. 707 , 112 L.Ed.2d 696 (1991) (error harmless unless reasonable likelihood that it affected defendant's substantial rights).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Woody F. Lemons
Under those statutes, each use of the mail or wire facilities “for the purpose of executing such scheme” is a separate offense. 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 1343; see, e.g., United States v. Gallardo, 915 F.2d 149, 151 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 707 , 112 L.Ed.2d 696 (1991); United States v. Blankenship, 746 F.2d 233, 236 (5th Cir.1984). *317 “Multiplicity” is charging a single offense in more than one count in an indictment.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jacecko
v.
West Chester State University
v.
West Chester State University
No. 90-6327.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 7, 1991.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.