green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. ACF Industries, Inc.
(BNA) 1903, 1906, 1993 WL 114643 *4 (N.D.Ill.1993); but cf. General Electric Co. v. Litton Business Systems, Inc., 715 F.Supp. 949, 952, 961 (W.D.Mo.1989), aff'd, 920 F.2d 1415 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 937 , 111 S.Ct. 1390 , 113 L.Ed.2d 446 (1991) (input of the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) served as a substitute for public comment, where the cleanup site was discussed in at least three public meetings of the Hazardous Waste Management Commission before and during the cleanup, a consent decree was entered between the owner and MDNR, MDNR monitored the appropriat…
discussed
Cited "but see"
In the Matter of Bell Petroleum Services, Inc., Debtor. United States Environmental Protection Agency v. Sequa Corporation and Chromalloy American Corp., United States of America v. Bell Petroleum Services, Inc., Regal International, Inc. And John R. Leigh, Sequa Corporation and Chromalloy American Corp.
But cf. Stanton Road Associates v. Lohrey Enterprises, 984 F.2d 1015 (9th Cir.1993) (holding that private parties are not entitled to recover attorneys' fees and expenses as costs incurred in bringing CERCLA cleanup cost recovery action), with General Electric Co. v. Litton Industrial Automation Systems, Inc., 920 F.2d 1415 (8th Cir.1990) (holding that private parties are entitled to recover attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in bringing CERCLA cleanup cost recovery action), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 937 , 111 S.Ct. 1390 , 113 L.Ed.2d 446 (1991). 182 Moreover, the purpose of the Sec. 9613(f)(2…
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States Environmental Protection Agency v. Sequa Corp.
But cf. Stanton Road Associates v. Lohrey Enterprises, 984 F.2d 1015 (9th Cir.1993) (holding that private parties are not entitled to recover attorneys’ fees and expenses as costs incurred in bringing CERCLA cleanup cost recovery action), with General Electric Co. v. Litton Industrial Automation Systems, Inc., 920 F.2d 1415 (8th Cir.1990) (holding that private parties are entitled to recover attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in bringing CERCLA cleanup cost recovery action), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 937 , 111 S.Ct. 1390 , 113 L.Ed.2d 446 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fleitas v. Union Chelsea National Bank
We agree that the actions of the New York bank in accepting the Florida cheek, initiating its collection through the normal Federal Reserve clearing house process, and paying the proceeds — all of which occurred in New York — did not, contrary to the plaintiffs’ assertions, subject it to the long-arm jurisdiction of the Florida court. §§ 48.181, 193(1), Fla.Stat. (1993); see Jet Charter Serv., Inc. v. Koeck, 907 F.2d 1110 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 937 , 111 S.Ct. 1390 , 113 L.Ed.2d 447 (1991); Oriental Imports and Exports, Inc. v. Maduro & Curiel’s Bank, N.V., 701 F.2d …
discussed
Cited "see"
Town of New Windsor v. Tesa Tuck, Inc.
See General Electric Co. v. Litton Industrial Automation Systems, Inc., 920 F.2d 1415, 1418 (8th Cir.1990) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 9607 (b)) (other citations omitted), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 937 , 111 S.Ct. 1390 , 113 L.Ed.2d 446 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hatco Corp. v. W.R. Grace & Co.—Conn.
See General Elec., 920 F.2d at 1418 (finding that “[t]he motives of the private party attempting to recoup response costs under 42 U.S.C. § 9607 (a)(4)(b) are irrelevant”), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 937 , 111 S.Ct. 1390 , 113 L.Ed.2d 446 (1991); Channel Master, 748 F.Supp. at 379 n. 7; BCW Assocs., 1988 WL 102641 , at *17.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Professional Claims, Inc.
See, e.g., Jet Charter Serv., Inc. v. Koeck, 907 F.2d 1110, 1112 (11th Cir.1990), cert. den., 499 U.S. 937 , 111 S.Ct. 1390 , 113 L.Ed.2d 447 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harden v. American Airlines
See, e.g., Jet Charter Serv., Inc. v. Koeck, 907 F.2d 1110, 1112 (11th Cir.1990) (discussing evidentiary submissions in challenge to jurisdiction), cert. den., 499 U.S. 937 , 111 S.Ct. 1390 , 113 L.Ed.2d 447 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dico, Inc.
See also General Electric Co. v. Litton Industrial Automation Systems, Inc., 920 F.2d 1415, 1417 (8th Cir. *1259 1990), cert, denied, 499 U.S. 937 , 111 S.Ct. 1390 , 113 L.Ed.2d 446 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Adhesives Research Inc. v. American Inks & Coatings Corp.
Compare General Electric Co. v. Litton Industrial Automation Sys., Inc., 920 F.2d 1415 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 937 , 111 S.Ct. 1390 , 113 L.Ed.2d 446 (1991) (permitting PRP to maintain cost recovery action), with Control Data Corp. v. S.C.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moog World Trade Corporation v. Bancomer, S.A. Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis
See also Jet Charter Serv., Inc. v. Koeck, 907 F.2d 1110, 1113-15 (11th Cir.1990) (no jurisdiction in Florida over Swiss bank for alleged breach of agreement to issue letter of credit payable in Florida because beneficiary is not a party to an agreement to issue), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 937 , 111 S.Ct. 1390 , 113 L.Ed.2d 447 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leonard A. Feinberg, Inc. v. Central Asia Capital Corp.
See e.g., Jet Charter Serv., Inc. v. Koeck, 907 F.2d 1110, 1114 (11th Cir.1990) (noting “routing remittal of commercial instruments such as checks or letters of credit incidentally bound for the forum state insufficient to establish minimum contacts”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 937 , 111 S.Ct. 1390 , 113 L.Ed.2d 447 (1991); Paccar, 757 F.2d at 1063-64 (concluding "the record does not support the conclusion that [defendant] purposefully availed itself of the priv *259 ilege of conducting business in California by becoming the beneficiary of the letter of credit"); Leney v. P…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hatco Corp. v. W.R. Grace & Co.—Conn.
See, e.g., General Electric Co. v. Litton Industrial Automation Systems, *1326 Inc., 920 F.2d 1415, 1418 (8th Cir.1990) (“CERCLA is a strict liability statute, with only a limited number of statutorily-defined defenses available"), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1390 , 113 L.Ed.2d 446 (1991); United States v. Kramer, 757 F.Supp. 397, 428 (D.N.J.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stewman v. Mid-South Wood Products of Mena, Inc.
See, e.g., General Electric Co. v. Litton Industrial, Automation Systems, Inc., 920 F.2d 1415, 1418 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 1390 , 113 L.Ed.2d 446 (1991); see also 42 U.S.C. § 9607 (b).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Delgaudio
v.
Kendrick, Judge, Circuit Court of Arlington County, Virginia
v.
Kendrick, Judge, Circuit Court of Arlington County, Virginia
No. 90-1227.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 25, 1991.
Published
Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.