green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Knight v. State of Ala.
Accord Reopell v. Com. of Massachusetts, 936 F.2d 12, 15 (1st Cir.1991), (prejudgment interest is recoverable in an action against a state bi’ought pursuant to a federal statute, “provided, of course, the Eleventh Amendment has been effectively abrogated by Congress in respect to the underlying damages award”) cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1004 , 112 S.Ct. 637 , 116 L.Ed.2d 655 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
69 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1348, 33 fed.r.serv.3d 604 Annette Winbush Marie Clark Harley Cooper Rita Williams Beverly Davis Lisa Sue Voyd Helen Floyd Terrance Jordan Nora Duncan Intervenor-Plaintiffs-Appellees, Frances Carson Intervenor-Plaintiff, Elzie Pittman Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, Carolyn McBride Charles Duncan Billie J. Harmon Edwin Lee Rollins Roberta J. Hubbard Rose Perry Ricardo Hunt Charles Floyd Estate of Patricia Perry Wendell Winbush Maricarol Martin Intervenor-Plaintiffs, Donita Duncan, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee v. State of Iowa, by Glenwood State Hospital William Campbell Rich Bowman Max Moore Richard Crawford
See Reopell v. Massachusetts, 936 F.2d 12, 15 (1st Cir.) ("[I]nterest is includible [against a state defendant] if, under normal litigation principles and rules of statutory construction, a court could have been expected to allow prejudgment interest on the underlying recovery."), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1004 , 112 S.Ct. 637 , 116 L.Ed.2d 655 (1991); Pegues, 899 F.2d at 1454 ("Congress did not limit the tools with which courts could fashion relief to victims of discrimination perpetrated by state defendants.") (emphasis added). 32 We further reject the defendants' contention that the district c…
discussed
Cited "see"
Winbush v. Iowa
See Reopell v. Massachusetts, 936 F.2d 12, 15 (1st Cir.) (“[I]nterest is includible [against a state defendant] if, under normal litigation principles and rules of statutory construction, a court could have been expected to allow prejudgment interest on the underlying recovery.”), cer t. denied, 502 U.S. 1004 , 112 S.Ct. 637 , 116 L.Ed.2d 655 (1991); Pegues, 899 F.2d at 1454 (“Congress did not limit the tools with which courts could fashion relief to victims of discrimination perpetrated by state defendants.”) (emphasis added).
cited
Cited "see"
Agapita Rosa Velazquez v. Edna J. Figueroa-Gomez, (Two Cases). Agapita Rosa Velazquez v. Edna J. Figueroa
See Hiraldo-Cancel v. Aponte, 925 F.2d 10, 13-14 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 637 , 116 L.Ed.2d 655 (1991); Rosario-Torres, 889 F.2d at 322-24 .
cited
Cited "see"
Rosa v. Figueroa Gomez,et al
See Hiraldo-Cancel v. Aponte, 925 F.2d 10 , -9- 13-14 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 637 (1991); Rosario- Torres, 889 F.2d at 322-24 .
cited
Cited "see"
Rosa v. Figueroa Gomez,et al
See Hiraldo-Cancel v. Aponte, 925 F.2d 10 , ___ ______________ ______ -9- 13-14 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 637 (1991); Rosario- ____________ ________ Torres, 889 F.2d at 322-24 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Massachusetts
v.
Reopell
v.
Reopell
No. 91-479.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 9, 1991.
Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.