green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Wright v. State
(2×)
See U.S. v. Rodriguez-Morales, 929 F.2d 780, 785 (1st Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1030 , 112 S.Ct. 868 , 116 L.Ed.2d 774 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America v. $ 404,905.00 in U.S. Currency, Stephen Alexander
Accord United States v. Rodriguez-Morales, 929 F.2d 780, 788-89 (1st Cir.1991) (dog sniff of impounded vehicle), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1030 , 112 S.Ct. 868 , 116 L.Ed.2d 774 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Cryan
See United State [States] v. Rodriguez-Morales, 929 F.2d 780, 784-86 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1030 , 112 S.Ct. 868 , 116 L.Ed. 2d 774 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Santos
See United States v. Rodriguez-Morales, 929 F.2d 780, 787 (1st Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1030 , 112 S.Ct. 868 , 116 L.Ed.2d 774 (1992); United States v. Gallo, 927 F.2d 815, 819 (5th Cir. 1991); United States v. Frank, 864 F.2d 992, 1003 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1095 , 109 S.Ct. 2442 , 104 L.Ed.2d 998 (1989); United States v. Edwin Palacios and Jason Palacios, 957 F.Supp. 50, 53-54 (S.D.N.Y.1997).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Washington
See United States v. Rodriguez-Morales, 929 F.2d 780, 784-86 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1030 , 112 S.Ct. 868 , 116 L.Ed.2d 774 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allen v. State
See United States v. Garcia, 938 F.2d 12 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1030 , 112 S.Ct. 868 , 116 L.Ed.2d 774 (1992); see also Lamb v. State, 668 So.2d 666 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Humphries v. State, 676 So.2d 1 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Thompson v. State, 667 So.2d 470 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Tape v. State, 661 So.2d 1287 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Ward v. State, 655 So.2d 1290 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mungin v. State
See United States v. Garcia, 938 F.2d 12 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1030 , 112 S.Ct. 868 , 116 L.Ed.2d 774 (1992); see also Lamb v. State, 668 So.2d 666 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Humphries v. State, 676 So.2d 1 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Thompson v. State, 667 So.2d 470 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Tape v. State, 661 So.2d 1287 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Ward v. State, 655 So.2d 1290 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Daniels v. State
See Thompson v. State , 581 So.2d 1216 , 1233 (Ala.Cr.App. 1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1030 , 112 S.Ct. 868 , 116 L.Ed.2d 774 (1992); Hallford v. State , 629 So.2d 6 , 14 (Ala.Cr.App. 1992), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 1870 , 128 L.Ed.2d 491 (1994). *Page 553 (2) Counsel failed to object to the appellant's exclusion from individual voir dire of the prospective jurors.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kimball
See United States v. Rodríguez-Morales, 929 F.2d 780, 783 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 868 , 116 L.Ed.2d 774 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kimball
See United States v. Rodr guez-Morales, 929 F.2d 780 , ___ _____________ _________________ 783 (1st Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 868 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Holladay v. State
See Thompson v. State , 581 So.2d 1216 , 1244 (Ala.Cr.App. 1991), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 868 , 116 L.Ed.2d 774 (1992) (wherein, in a footnote, this court agreed with the trial court's holding that, because testimony at the hearing did not relate to an allegation of ineffectiveness raised by the *Page 678 petitioner, it could not constitute a basis for relief, because a petitioner "is not entitled to relief on any claim not pleaded with specificity.
discussed
Cited "see"
Watkins v. State
(2×)
See Thompson v. State , 581 So.2d 1216 , 1236 (Ala.Cr.App. 1991), cert. denied, *Page 559 ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 868 , 116 L.Ed.2d 774 (1992) (counsel not ineffective for failing to act on possible future developments in law).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary Ray Barbee and Juanita Elizabeth Barbee, Also Known as Juanita Elizabeth Lopez-Ayon
Morales-Zamora, 914 F.2d at 203 ; accord United States v. Rodriguez-Morales, 929 F.2d 780, 788-89 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 868 , 116 L.Ed.2d 774 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Terwilliger
See, e.g., United States v. Garcia, 938 F.2d 12 , 13–16 (1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1030 , 112 S. Ct. 868 , 116 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Flowers v. Fiore
(2×)
United States v. Kimball, 25 F.3d 1, 6 (1st Cir.1994); see also United States v. Rodriguez-Morales, 929 F.2d 780, 783 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1030 , 112 S.Ct. 868 , 116 L.Ed.2d 774 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bridges
United States v. Wallace, 102 F.3d 346, 348 (8th Cir.1996) (citing United States v. Marshall, 986 F.2d 1171, 1176 (8th Cir.1993)); see also United States v. Rodriguez-Morales, 929 F.2d 780, 787 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 *1037 U.S. 1030, 112 S.Ct. 868 , 116 L.Ed.2d 774 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Christopher Duguay
(2×)
See also United States v. Rodriguez-Morales, 929 F.2d 780 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied 502 U.S. 1030 , 112 S.Ct. 868 , 116 L.Ed.2d 774 (1992) (collecting federal cases) 3 Under the Motor Vehicle Code, the police may remove (1) "any unattended vehicle illegally left standing" on a public thoroughfare "under such circumstances as to obstruct the normal movement of traffic," under 625 ILCS 5/11-1302(b), (2) a vehicle which has been illegally parked, under 625 ILCS 5/11-1302(a); 11-1301, (3) a vehicle which has been reported stolen, under 625 ILCS 5/11-1302(c)(1), (4) a vehicle when "the person or…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. McCarthy
Kimball, 25 F.3d at 6 ; see also United States v. Rodriguez-Morales, 929 F.2d 780, 783 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1030 , 112 S.Ct. 868 , 116 L.Ed.2d 774 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Zachary Marshall
See, e.g., United States v. Porter, 859 F.2d 83, 85 (8th Cir.1988) (per curiam) ("[A]n officer's suspicion that evidence may be present does not invalidate an otherwise lawful inventory search."); United States v. Spencer, 884 F.2d at 361 (finding existence and application of sufficient standardized policy); United States v. Davis, 882 F.2d at 1339 (same); see also United States v. Rodriguez-Morales, 929 F.2d 780, 787 (1st Cir. 1991) ("As long as impoundment pursuant to the community caretaking function is not a mere subterfuge for investigation, the coexistence of investigatory and caretaking…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thompson
v.
Alabama
v.
Alabama
No. 91-553.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 1992.
Published
Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari denied.