green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kyle Doolin
See United States v. Johnston, 973 F.2d 611, 614-15 (8th Cir.1992) (holding that a bare allegation of bad faith is insufficient to require an inquiry into the government’s decision not to file § 5K1.1 motion), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1068 , 113 S.Ct. 1019 , 122 L.Ed.2d 165 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry D. Gladfelter
See United States v. Johnston, 973 F.2d 611, 615 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1068 , 113 S.Ct. 1019 , 122 L.Ed.2d 165 (1993); United States v. Turner, 975 F.2d 490, 498 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1082 , 113 S.Ct. 1053 , 122 L.Ed.2d 360 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry D. Gladfelter
See United States v. Johnston, 973 F.2d 611, 615 (8th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1068 (1993); United States v. Turner, 975 F.2d 490, 498 (8th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1082 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fred SMITH, Defendant-Appellant
See United States v. Fortenberry, 971 F.2d 717, 721 (11th Cir.1992) (evidence of double murder probative and admissible in trial for gun possession), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1068 , 113 S.Ct. 1020 , 122 L.Ed.2d 166 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tokars
See United States v. Fortenberry, 971 F.2d 717, 721 (11th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1068 , 113 S. Ct. 1020 , 122 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tokars
See United States v. Fortenberry, 971 F.2d 717, 721 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1068 , 113 S.Ct. 1020 , 122 L.Ed.2d *1538 166 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Antonio Lucas
See, e.g., United States v. Johnston, 973 F.2d 611, 613 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1068 (1993); United States v. Kelly, 956 F.2d 748, 753-56 (8th Cir.1992) (en banc) (holding that a sentencing court may depart from the sentencing guidelines only in the manner prescribed by the guidelines); but see United States v. Edgar, 971 F.2d 89, 96-99 (8th Cir.1992) (Heaney, J., concurring and dissenting) (arguing that sentencing court has authority to impose non-guideline sentence that comports with "purposes of sentencing or the nature of the offense as set forth in [the Sentencing Reform Ac…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Antonio Lucas
See, e.g., United States v. Johnston, 973 F.2d 611, 613 (8th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1068 (1993); United States v. Kelly, 956 F.2d 748, 753-56 (8th Cir. 1992) (en banc) (holding that a sentencing court may depart from the sentencing guidelines only in the manner prescribed by the guidelines); but see United States v. Edgar, 971 F.2d 89, 96-99 (8th Cir. 1992) (Heaney, J., concurring and dissenting) (arguing that sentencing court has authority to impose non-guideline sentence that comports with "purposes of sentencing or the nature of the offense as set forth in [the Sentencing Reform…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ruiz
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 92-6670.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 11, 1993.
506 U.S. 1068
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.