green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
8.9 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Daubert in no way altered the discretion [under Rule 403] that resides with the district court judge to determine whether such evidence is properly admitted.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“In order for a person to constructively possess a drug, he must either own it or have dominion or control over it.”
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fred SMITH, Defendant-Appellant
But see United States v. Rincon, 28 F.3d 921, 924-25 (9th Cir.) (affirming district court’s ruling that testimony was not related to a scientific subject), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1029 , 115 S.Ct. 605 , 130 L.Ed.2d 516 (1994); United States v. Watson, 587 F.2d 365, 369 (7th Cir.1978) (affirming exclusion of expert testimony because scientific field inadequately developed), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1132 , 99 S.Ct. 1055 , 59 L.Ed.2d 95 (1979).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Billinger
in order for a person to constructively possess a drug, he must either own it or have dominion or control over it.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Richard Cotto v. Victor Herbert, Warden, Attica Correctional Facility
the motivation of a witness in testifying, including her possible self-interest and any bias or prejudice against the defendant, is one of the principal subjects for cross-examination.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Martin
whether a defendant has proven that he was legally insane is a factual question, and we will reverse the trial court's finding only if it is clearly erroneous.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Cordoba
daubert in no way altered the discretion that resides with the district court judge to determine whether such evidence is properly admitted.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph A. Katalinich
See United States v. Lindsey, 30 F.3d 68, 70-71 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1029 , 115 S.Ct. 604 , 130 L.Ed.2d 515 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jeffrey Washington v. Sunny Schriver, Superintendent, Wallkill Correctional Facility
(2×)
But the sting survives such instructions, which is why lawyers ask impeaching questions that they know will produce denials."); see also Henry v. Speckard, 22 F.3d 1209, 1215 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1029 (1994) ("[I]t is entirely open to a party to try to counter his opponent's case by asking questions designed to expose, inter alia, an opposing witness's bias.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jeffrey Washington v. Sunny Schriver, Superintendent, Wallkill Correctional Facility
But the sting survives such instructions, which is why lawyers ask impeaching questions that they know will produce' denials.”); see also Henry v. Speckard, 22 F.3d 1209, 1215 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1029 , 115 S.Ct. 606 , 130 L.Ed.2d 517 (1994) (“[I]t is entirely open to a party to try to counter his opponent’s case by asking questions designed to expose, inter alia, an opposing witness’s bias.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frank Javier Cordoba
“The Rule 403 weighing process-that of balancing the probative value of the proffered evidence against its potential for unfair prejudice or confusion of issues-is primarily for the district court to perform.” United States v. Layton, 767 F.2d 549, 553 (9th Cir.1985); see also United States v. Rincon, 28 F.3d 921, 925 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1029 , 115 S.Ct. 605 , 130 L.Ed.2d 516 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lindsey
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 94-6561.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 28, 1994.
513 U.S. 1029
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.