green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
7.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2000 · 2 courts ·
…any break in the chain of custody goes to the weight of the evidence rather than its admissibility
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Premier Capital, Inc. v. Grossman, No. Cv99 0334654 S (Nov. 22, 2000)
any break in the chain of custody goes to the weight of the evidence rather than its admissibility
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
New England Savings Bank v. Bedford Realty Corp.
any break in the chain of custody goes to the weight of the evidence rather than its admissibility
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Sylvester Tolliver, Gerald Elwood, Danielle Bernard Metz, Gennero Arthur, Noah Moore, Jr., Marlo Helmstetter, Glenn Metz, and Shane Sterling, United States of America v. Noah Moore, Jr.
any prejudice created by a joint trial can generally be cured through careful jury instructions.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Greathouse
See U.S. v. Jones, 56 F.3d 581 , 583 n. 4 (5th Cir.1995) Unless or until the co-defendant’s case is severed from the defendant’s, “the excludable delay of one codefendant may be attributed to all defendants.” United States v. Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1567 (5th Cir.1994), ce rt. denied, 513 U.S. 1156 , 115 S.Ct. 1113 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1995) [emphasis by the court]; see also State v. Thomas, 10-0528, 10-0529, 10-0303 (La.App. 4 Cir. 7/15/10) , 54 So.3d 1 . | uThe judgment of the trial court is vacated and this ease is remanded to the trial court with instructions to determine the issues r…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Prentice
See, United States v. Rabinowitz, 56 F.3d 932, 933 (8th Cir.1995) (“The risk of a nonunanimous jury verdict inherent in a duplicitous count may be cured by a limiting instruction.”), citing United States v. Karam, 37 F.3d 1280, 1286 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1156 , 115 S.Ct. 1113 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1995); see also, United States v. Pierce, 479 F.3d 546, 552 (8th Cir.2007).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William T. Carter
See United States v. Karam, 37 F.3d 1280, 1285 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1156 , 115 S.Ct. 1113 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Damon Beaman
The prosecutor complied with that ruling and thus did no more “than argue permissible inferences from the evidence.” United States v. Beckman, 222 F.3d 512, 527 (8th Cir.2000); see United States v. Karam, 37 F.3d 1280, 1289 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1156 , 115 S.Ct. 1113 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frenklyn Piggie
(2×)
See United States v. Karam, 37 F.3d 1280, 1285 (8th Cir.1994) (citing United States v. Kenyon, 7 F.3d 783, 786 (8th Cir.1993)), cert. denied, El Hani v. United States, 513 U.S. 1156 , 115 S.Ct. 1113 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Central SEC. and Alarm Co., Inc. v. Mehler
See United States v. Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1574 (5th Cir.1994) (gap in chain of custody affects weight, not admissibility), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1113 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1077 , and cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1825 , 131 L.Ed.2d 746 (1995); Matador Drilling Co. v. Post, 662 F.2d 1190, 1199 (5th Cir.1981) (questions of completeness and accuracy affect weight, not admissibility); United States v. Schwartz, 464 F.2d 499, 511 (2d Cir.) (business records admissible despite impeachment for accuracy and completeness), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 443 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972);…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tolliver
See United States v. Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1572 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1113 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1995) ("Any prejudice created by a joint trial can generally be cured through careful jury instructions.”). 8 . 18 U.S.C. §§ 5031-5042 . 9 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas J. McCarthy
See also United States v. Karam, 37 F.3d 1280, 1284 (8th Cir.1994) (departure pursuant to § 3553(e)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1113 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1995); United States v. Left Hand Bull, 901 F.2d 647, 650 (8th Cir.1990) (departure pursuant to USSG § 5K2.10).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas Joseph McCarthy United States of America v. Clarence William Houston, Also Known as C.W. Houston, United States of America v. John Walter Piner, United States of America v. Carl Luverne Thompsen, United States of America v. Michael Arney Ness, United States of America v. Stephen Lloyd Labrie
See also United States v. Karam, 37 F.3d 1280, 1284 (8th Cir.1994) (departure pursuant to § 3553(e)), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1156 , 115 S.Ct. 1113 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1995); United States v. Left Hand Bull, 901 F.2d 647, 650 (8th Cir.1990) (departure pursuant to USSG § 5K2.10).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kenneth Blankenship
See United States v. Duranseau, 26 F.3d 804, 808 (8th Cir.) (citing Koory, 20 F.3d at 847 ), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 341 , 130 L.Ed.2d 298 (1994); see also United States v. Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1566 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. - and — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1113 and 115 S.Ct. 1825 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1077 and 131 L.Ed.2d 746 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Trung Van Tran
v.
Oregon Department of Revenue
v.
Oregon Department of Revenue
No. 94-1215.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1995.
Sup. Ct. Ore. Certiorari denied.