discussed Cited "see" UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Danny Lynn QUALLS, Defendant-Appellant (2×) See United States v. Estrella, 104 F.3d 3, 7-9 (1st Cir.) (prohibiting a felon from possessing all firearms under 18 U.S.C. §§ 921 (a)(20) and 922(g)(1) if the felon is prohibited from possessing any firearm under state law), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1110 , 117 S.Ct. 2494 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1001 (1997); United States v. Driscoll, 970 F.2d 1472, 1480 (6th Cir.1992) (same); United States v. Burns, 934 F.2d 1157, 1160 (10th Cir.1991) (same). 7 In Caron, the Supreme Court adopted the all-or-nothing construction of the federal felon-in-possession statute.

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Brown L. ch. 269, § 10(a)(4)); see also United States v. Estrella, 104 F.3d 3, 7-8 (1st Cir.) (noting the “patchwork of restrictions” Massachusetts imposes on ex-felons), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1110 , 117 S.Ct. 2494 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1001 (1997).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Caron v. United States (2×) Compare, e. g., United States v. Estrella, 104 F. 3d 3, 8 (CA1) (adopting former reading), cert. denied, 521 U. S. 1110 (1997), and United States v. Driscoll, 970 F. 2d 1472 , 1480— 1481 (CA6 1992) (same), cert. denied, 506 U. S. 1083 (1993), with United States v. Qualls, 140 F. 3d 824, 826 (CA9 1998) (en banc) (intermediate position), and United States v. Shoemaker, 2 F. 3d 53, 55-56 (CA4 1993) (same), cert. denied, 510 U. S. 1047 (1994).