green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.5 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Landell v. Sorrell
a fortiori, the spending of money legally raised by candidates themselves poses no risk of quid pro quo corruption ...
discussed
Cited "see"
Stewart v. Electrolux Home Prods., Inc.
Evid. 201(b)(2) ; See Parrino v. FHP, Inc. , 146 F.3d 699 , 705-06 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1001 , 119 S.Ct. 510 , 142 L.Ed.2d 423 (1998) (holding district court, in ruling on motion to dismiss, "may consider documents whose contents are alleged in a [pleading] and whose authenticity no party questions").
discussed
Cited "see"
Golio v. Suggs
See Norton v. Sam’s Club, 145 F.3d 114, 117 (2d Cir.) (“Issues not sufficiently argued in the briefs are considered waived and normally will not be addressed on appeal.”), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1001 , 119 S.Ct. 511 , 142 L.Ed.2d 424 (1998); In re Harris, 464 F.3d 263 , 268 n. 3 (2d Cir.2006) (“We generally do not consider issues raised in a reply brief for the first time because if an appellant raises a new argument in a reply brief an appellee may not have an adequate opportunity to respond to it.” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kormendi v. Computer Associates International, Inc.
See Norton v. Sam’s Club, 145 F.3d 114, 117 (2d Cir.1998) (“Issues not sufficiently argued in the briefs are considered waived and normally will not be addressed on appeal.”), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1001 , 119 S.Ct. 511 , 142 L.Ed.2d 424 (1998). 1 We accordingly turn directly to the merits.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mason v. Arizona
Similarly, a district court may consider any documents referred to or “whose contents are alleged in a complaint and whose authenticity no party questions.” Id. at 454; see Lee, 250 F.3d at 688 (citing Parrino v. FHP, Inc., 146 F.3d 699, 705-06 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1001 , 119 S.Ct. 510 , 142 L.Ed.2d 423 (1998)); Sprewell v. Golden State Warriors, 266 F.3d 979, 988 (9th Cir.2001) (citing Branch, 14 F.3d at 453-54 ); see also Robinson v. Fred Meyers Stores, Inc., 184 F.Supp.2d 968, 972 (D.Ariz.2002); see Federal Civil Procedure Before Trial § 9:212.1, at 9-54.
discussed
Cited "see"
Yurman Design, Inc. v. Chaindom Enterprises, Inc.
See Norton v. Sam’s Club, 145 F.3d 114, 117 (2d Cir.1998) (“Issues not sufficiently argued in the briefs are considered waived and normally will not be addressed on appeal.”), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1001 , 119 S.Ct. 511 , 142 L.Ed.2d 424 (1998).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Malone v. IOU Central, Inc
See also Branch v. Tunnell, 14 F.3d 449, 453-454 (9th Cir. 1994), cert. den. 525 U.S. 1001 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hanna v. New York Hotel Trades Council
(Forrest, 3 NY3d at 305 [“(t)o prevail on their summary judgment motion, defendants (may demonstrate) plaintiff's failure to establish every element of intentional discrimination”]; Ioele v Alden Press, 145 AD2d 29, 34-36 [1st Dept 1989]; see also Norton v Sam’s Club, 145 F3d 114, 119 [2d Cir 1998], cert denied 525 US 1001 [1998] [overturning jury’s verdict due to very weak prima facie case]; Sedor v Frank, 42 F3d 741, 746 [2d Cir 1994], cert denied 515 US 1123 [1995] [“(i)f proof of any of the four elements (of the prima facie case) is lacking, the claim must fail”]; Winiarski v C…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Quaresma v. BC LIFE & HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY
See also Parrino v. FHP, Inc., 146 F.3d 699, 703-704 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1001 , 119 S.Ct. 510 , 142 L.Ed.2d 423 (1998): Parrino’s causes of action for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and for civil conspiracy are both predicated upon alleged defects in FHP’s procedures for processing health insurance claims.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
(2×)
See Cox, 183 F.3d at 1264 (plaintiffs' "alleged inability meaningfully to participate in and influence elections is attributable to the conduct and resources of private individuals, not the state"); NAACP, Los Angeles Branch v. Jones, 131 F.3d 1317, 1323 (9th Cir.1997) (rejecting equal protection claim similar to that of Adams plaintiffs because "no state action put[s] wealthy voters in a better position to contribute to campaigns than nonwealthy voters"), cert, denied, 525 U.S. 813 , 119 S.Ct. 48 , 142 L.Ed.2d 37 (1998); see also Kruse v. City of Cincinnati 142 F.3d 907 , 917 n. 17 (6th Cir.)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Germann v. Vulcan Materials Co.
Copper Co., 740 F.2d 1468, 1472 (9th Cir.1984), overruled on other grounds, Allis-Chalmers v. Lueck, 471 U.S. 202 , 105 S.Ct. 1904 , 85 L.Ed.2d 206 (1985); see also Panino v. FHP, Inc., 146 F.3d 699, 704 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1001 , 119 S.Ct. 510 , 142 L.Ed.2d 423 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hanifi
v.
Motor Club of America Insurance Co.
v.
Motor Club of America Insurance Co.
No. 98-309.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 16, 1998.
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.