Villarreal v. Ema, 530 U.S. 1220 (2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Villarreal v. Ema, 530 U.S. 1220 (2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Wagner (ca9, 2001-09-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Wagner
9th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sarkisian, 197 F.3d 966, 989-90 (9th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1220 , 120 S.Ct. 2230 , 147 L.Ed.2d 260 (2000).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Essien
5th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Myers, 198 F.3d 160, 168 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1220 (2000).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Forte
5th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Myers, 198 F.3d 160 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1220 (2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. David Lane McGlothlin
8th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
See 18 U.S.C. § 3664 (f)(1)(B)(2)(A) (“Upon determination of the amount of restitution owed to each victim, the court shall ... specify ... the schedule according to which, the restitution is to be paid, in consideration of ... the financial resources and other assets of the defendant.”); see also United States v. Myers, 198 F.3d 160, 169 (5th Cir.1999) (finding it erroneous for sentencing court to order $40,000 in restitution due immediately and remanding on the issue of schedule of payment when defendant had no ability to pay in lump sum), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1220 , 120 S.Ct. 2230 , …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. David L. McGlothlin
8th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
See 18 U.S.C. § 3664 (f)(1)(B)(2)(A) ("Upon determination of the amount of restitution owed to each victim, the court shall . . . specify . . . the schedule according to which, the restitution is to be paid, in consideration of . . . the financial resources and other assets of the defendant."); see also United States v. Myers, 198 F.3d 160, 169 (5th Cir. 1999) (finding it erroneous for sentencing court to order $40,000 in restitution due immediately and remanding on the issue of schedule of payment when defendant had no ability to pay in lump sum), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1220 (2000); United S…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Villarreal
v.
Ema
No. 99-9275.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 5, 2000.
530 U.S. 1220
Published

C. A. 11th Cir. Certio-rari denied.