green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2008 · 2 courts ·
…errors in the application of state law, especially rulings regarding the admission or exclusion of evidence, are usually not to be questioned in a federal habeas corpus proceeding.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rice v. Moore
errors in the application of state law, especially rulings regarding the admission or exclusion of evidence, are usually not to be questioned in a federal habeas corpus proceeding.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Kumal Burton v. Paul Renico, Warden
errors in the application of state law, especially rulings regarding the admission or exclusion of evidence, are usually not to be questioned in a federal habeas corpus proceeding.
cited
Cited "see"
Brinkley v. Houk
See Seymour v. Walker, 224 F.3d 542, 554 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 989 , 121 S.Ct. 1643 , 149 L.Ed.2d 502 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Willie Jones v. Shirlee Harry
See Seymour v. Walker, 224 F.3d 542, 561 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 989 , 121 S.Ct. 1643 , 149 L.Ed.2d 502 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nelloms v. Jackson
See Seymour v. Walker, 224 F.3d 542, 561 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 989 , 121 S.Ct. 1643 , 149 L.Ed.2d 502 (2001) (indicating that an appellate court should not consider habeas claims not raised before the district court).
cited
Cited "see"
Wampler v. Mills
See Seymour v. Walker, 224 F.3d 542, 549 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 989 , 121 S.Ct. 1643 , 149 L.Ed.2d 502 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Ferqueron v. Straub
See Seymour v. Walker, 224 F.3d 542, 561 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 989 , 121 S.Ct. 1643 , 149 L.Ed.2d 502 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
King v. Trippett
See Seymour v. Walker, 224 F.3d 542, 549 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 989 , 121 S.Ct. 1643 , 149 L.Ed.2d 502 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. United States
See Seymour v. Walker, 224 F.3d 542, 561 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 121 S.Ct. 1643 , 149 L.Ed.2d 502 (2001); Ross v. Ward, 165 F.3d 793, 797 (10th Cir.1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ovalle v. United States
See, e.g., Seymour v. Walker, 224 F.3d 542, 561 (6th Cir.2000), cert, denied, 532 U.S. 989 , 121 S.Ct. 1643 , 149 L.Ed.2d 502 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Foster v. Ludwick
“Generally, state-court evidentiary rulings cannot rise to the level of due process violations unless they ‘offend[ ] some principle of justice so rooted in the traditions and conscience of our people as to be ranked as fundamental.’ Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996)(quoting Patterson v. New York, 432 U.S. 197, 202 , 97 S.Ct. 2319 , 53 L.Ed.2d 281 (1977)); see also Spencer v. Texas, 385 U.S. 554, 563-64 , 87 S.Ct. 648 , 17 L.Ed.2d 606 (1967).” Seymour v. Walker, 224 F.3d 542, 552 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 989 , 121 S.Ct. 1643 , …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David v. Lavinge
Therefore, “[hjabeas review does not encompass state court rulings on the admission of evidence unless there is a constitutional violation.” Clemmons v. Sowders, 34 F.3d 352, 357 (6th Cir.1994); see also Seymour v. Walker, 224 F.3d 542, 552 (6th Cir.2000) (explaining that errors in the application of state law, especially rulings on the admission or exclusion of evidence, usually are not questioned in a federal habeas corpus proceeding unless the errors violate a fundamental principle of justice) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 989 , 121 S.Ct. 1643 , 149 L.Ed.2d 502 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pacheco
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 00-9061.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 16, 2001.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1) · S.D. Ohio (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.