Pieper v. Am. Arbitration Ass'n, 540 U.S. 1182 (2004).

Pieper v. Am. Arbitration Ass'n, 540 U.S. 1182 (2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment 3.2 score

6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: Thomas Kuduk v. BNSF Railway Company (ca8, 2014-10-07)

Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗

discussed Cited "see" Thomas Kuduk v. BNSF Railway Company

8th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high

See Allen v. City of Pocahontas, 340 F.3d 551 , 558 n. 6 (8th Cir. 2003) (“it is not unlawful for a company to make employment decisions based upon erroneous information and evaluations”), cert, denied, 540 U.S. 1182 , 124 S.Ct. 1420 , 158 L.Ed.2d 85 (2004).

cited Cited "see" Weigand v. Spadt

D. Neb. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high

See Payne v. Ballard, 761 F.2d 491, 493 (8th Cir.1985).” Allen v. City of Pocahontas, 340 F.3d 551 , 556 (8th Cir.2003), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 1420 , 158 L.Ed.2d 85 (2004).