discussed Cited "see" United States v. Riggins See United States v. Gantt, 679 F.3d 1240, 1247 (10th Cir.) (“A variance can be imposed without compliance with the rigorous requirements for departures.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 555 , 184 L.Ed.2d 361 (2012); Adams, 751 F.3d at 1182 (“We have declined to address arguments against variances that rely only on law applicable to departures.”).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Chavez See United States v. Gantt, 679 F.3d 1240, 1247 (10th Cir.2012) (reviewing for plain error a procedural unreasonableness claim tied to a guideline sentence departure because “[although Defendant’s supplemental sentencing memorandum had argued against a departure, Defendant’s complaint on appeal is not that the court rejected his arguments but that the court did not adequately explain why it acted as it did”), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 555 , 184 L.Ed.2d 361 (2012).