green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.7 score
“it is well settled that if a party does not challenge the consistency of 304 jury verdicts while the jury is still empaneled, the objection is waived.”
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Morris v. Flaig
it is well settled that if a party does not challenge the consistency of 304 jury verdicts while the jury is still empaneled, the objection is waived.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gleason v. Smolinski
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See DiBella v. Hopkins, 403 F.3d 102, 110 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 939 , 126 S. Ct. 428 , 163 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Giuffre Hyundai, Ltd. v. Hyundai Motor America
See DiBella v. Hopkins, 403 F.3d 102, 111 (2d Cir.) (“Issues of state law are not to be routinely certified to the highest court of New York simply because a certification procedure is available.” (alterations omitted)), ce rt. denied, 546 U.S. 939 , 126 S.Ct. 428 , 163 L.Ed.2d 326 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
Grady H. Woods and Monroe Woods v. Mary Elizabeth Woods
See In re Commitment of Fisher , 164 S.W.3d 637, 655 (Tex. 2005), cert. denied , __U.S.__, 126 S.Ct. 428 , 163 L.Ed.2d 326 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
Woods v. Woods
See In re Commitment of Fisher, 164 S.W.3d 637, 655 (Tex.2005), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 428 , 163 L.Ed.2d 326 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Phil & Kathy's Inc. v. Safra National Bank of New York
See, e.g., DiBella v. Hopkins, 403 F.3d 102, 111 (2d Cir.) (“Certification is to be used in those cases where there is a split of authority on the issue, where a statute's plain language does not indicate the answer, or when presented with a complex question of New York common law for which no New York authority can be found.”) (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 939 , 126 S.Ct. 428 , 163 L.Ed.2d 326 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HealthPath of Mercer County, Inc.
v.
Aetna, Inc.
v.
Aetna, Inc.
No. 05-239.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 2005.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. New York (1)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.