green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
In Re DW
But see In re M.N., 230 S.W.3d 248, 249-50 (Tex. App.-Eastland 2007, no pet.) (holding issue waived that was only contained in motion for new trial filed after fifteen-day deadline expired, even though trial court granted motion to extend time to file statement of points). [15] See In re K.A.F., 160 S.W.3d 923, 928 (Tex.) (acknowledging constitutional issues related to provisions of family code governing appeals could not have been raised in trial court and, therefore, were required to be raised in court of appeals to preserve error for consideration by supreme court), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 9…
discussed
Cited "but see"
in the Interest of D.W., T.W., and S.G., Children
But see In re M.N., 230 S.W.3d 248, 249-50 (Tex. App.-Eastland 2007, no pet.) (holding issue waived that was only contained in motion for new trial filed after fifteen-day deadline expired, even though trial court granted motion to extend time to file statement of points). .See In re K.A.F., 160 S.W.3d 923, 928 (Tex.) (acknowledging constitutional issues related to provisions of family code governing appeals could not have been raised in trial court and, therefore, were required to be raised in court of appeals to preserve error for consideration by supreme court), cert, denied, 546 U.S. 961 ,…
discussed
Cited "see"
Moody v. Dexter
See Doe v. Menefee, 391 F.3d 147, 161 (2d Cir.2004) (“Because Schlup explicitly states that the proffered evidence must be reliable, the habeas court must determine whether the new evidence is trustworthy by considering it both on its own merits and, where appropriate, in light of the preexisting evidence in the record.”), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 961 , 126 S.Ct. 489 , 163 L.Ed.2d 364 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Whitley v. Senkowski
See Doe v. Menefee, 391 F.3d 147, 160 (2d Cir.2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 961 , 126 S.Ct. 489 , 163 L.Ed.2d 364 (2005); Lucidore v. New York State Div. of Parole, 209 F.3d 107, 114 (2d Cir.2000), ce rt. denied, 531 U.S. 873 , 121 S.Ct. 175 , 148 L.Ed.2d 120 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
in the Interest of D.W., T.W., and S.G., Children
But see In re M.N. , 230 S.W.3d 248 , 249–50 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2007, no pet.) (holding issue waived that was only contained in motion for new trial filed after fifteen-day deadline expired, even though trial court granted motion to extend time to file statement of points). 15: See In re K.A.F., 160 S.W.3d 923, 928 (Tex.) (acknowledging constitutional issues related to provisions of family code governing appeals could not have been raised in trial court and, therefore, were required to be raised in court of appeals to preserve error for consideration by supreme court), cert. denied , 546 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
in the Interest of D.R., C.R. and D.R., Minor Children
App. P. 2, 25.1(b), 26.3, 42.3(a), 44.3; Jones, 976 S.W.2d at 677 ; Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617 ; see also In re K.A.F., 160 S.W.3d 923, 928 (Tex.) (affirming appellate court’s judgment dismissing appeal from termination order for want of jurisdiction because notice of appeal was filed more than twenty days after the trial court’s judgment was signed), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 961 (2005); In re A.N.C., No. 02-09-00429-CV, 2010 WL 1006410 , at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Mar. 18, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing appeal from termination order for failure to timely file notice of appeal). /…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
in Re Commitment of James Andrew McCormack
See Tex. Dep’t of Protective & Regulatory Servs. v. Sherry, 46 S.W.3d 857, 861 (Tex. 2001) (holding that failure to assert a constitutional claim in trial court bars appellate review of claim); see also In re K.A.F., 160 S.W.3d 923, 928 (Tex. 2005) (noting that constitutional complaints may be waived), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 961 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
in Re Commitment of Patrick Wayne Cary
See Tex. Dep’t of Protective & Regulatory Servs. v. Sherry, 46 S.W.3d 857, 861 (Tex. 2001) (failure to assert constitutional claim in trial court bars appellate review of claim); see also In re K.A.F., 160 S.W.3d 923, 928 (Tex. 2005) (constitutional complaints may be 8 waived), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 961 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kerian
v.
Harvey, Secretary of the Army
v.
Harvey, Secretary of the Army
No. 05-245.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 17, 2005.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.