green
Positive treatment
1.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
in the Matter of R.F.
Compare Trevino v. State, 218 S.W.3d 234, 239 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2007, no pet.) (holding the Sixth Amendment right to confrontation as set out in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 , 124 S. Ct. 1354 (2004) does not apply to probation revocation hearings), Diaz v. State, 172 S.W.3d 668, 672 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2005, no pet.) (holding Crawford does not apply to community supervision revocation hearings), and Smart v. State, 153 S.W.3d 118, 121 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 2005, pet ref’d), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1016 , 126 S.Ct. 663 , 163 L.Ed.2d 527 (2005) (same), with Blackman…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Miller
v.
Colorado
v.
Colorado
No. 05-6667.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 14, 2005.
Published
Sup. Ct. Colo. Certio-rari denied.