green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Adrian Dunn
See United States v. Davis, 417 F.3d 909, 913 (8th Cir.2005) (standard of review), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1144 , 126 S.Ct. 1160 , 163 L.Ed.2d 1011 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Winfred E. Taylor
See United States v. Davis, 417 F.3d 909, 912-13 (8th Cir.2005), cert. denied 546 U.S. 1144 , 126 S.Ct. 1160 , 163 L.Ed.2d 1011 (2006); Slicer, 361 F.3d at 1086-87 ; United States v. Maxon, 339 F.3d 656, 658-59 (8th Cir.2003); United States v. Franklin, 250 F.3d 653, 664-65 (8th Cir.2001); United States v. Ortega, 150 F.3d 937, 947-49 (8th Cir.1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Mata-Peres, United States of America v. Felix Luna-Hernandez
See, e.g., Shepard, 462 F.3d at 871-72 (examining the nature of prior convictions for sentencing purposes), United States v. Davis, 417 F.3d 909, 913 (8th Cir.2005) (rejecting defendant’s arguments that the facts related to a prior conviction should have been submitted to the jury prior to imposition of a mandatory-minimum sentence), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 1160 , 163 L.Ed.2d 1011 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lisker v. Knowles
See Gildon, 384 F.3d at 887 (agreeing with Eighth Circuit that equitable tolling might be available to petitioner who demonstrated his innocence if he could not have discovered facts underlying claim of innocence within the limitations, period); see also Balsewicz v. Kingston, 425 F.3d 1029, 1033-34 (7th Cir.2005) (suggesting showing of innocence might require tolling if presented in conjunction with a claim of equitable tolling), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 1160 , 163 L.Ed.2d 1011 (2006). 13 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ortiz-Merced
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 05-8130.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 17, 2006.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.