green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2003 ·
…failure to make a meritless argument does not amount to ineffective assistance.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Johnson v. United States
(2×)
failure to make a meritless argument does not amount to ineffective assistance.
discussed
Cited "see"
Andrew Thomas v. State of Tennessee
See generally, United States v. Arena, 180 F.3d 380, 396 (2d Cir. 1999) (stating that a “Failure to make a meritless argument does not amount to ineffective assistance”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 811 , 121 S. Ct. 33 (2000); United States v. Kirsch, 54 F.3d 1062, 1071 (2d Cir.) (stating that “[T]he failure to make a meritless argument does not rise to the level of ineffective assistance”), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 927 , 116 S. Ct. 330 (1995); United States v. DiPaolo, 804 F.2d 225, 234 (2d Cir.1986) (finding no ineffective assistance where attorney failed to make an objection that “appear…
cited
Cited "see"
Tom A. Furnes v. Pamela Kay Reeves
See Janakakis-Kostun v. Janakakis, 6 S.W.3d 843 (Ky.Ct.App.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 811 , 121 S.Ct. 32 , 148 L.Ed.2d 13 (2000). 15 .
discussed
Cited "see"
G-I Holdings, Inc. v. Baron & Budd
(2×)
See United States v. Arena, 180 F.3d 380, 392 (2d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 811 , 121 S.Ct. 33 , 148 L.Ed.2d 13 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anderson
(2×)
See United States v. Arena, 180 F.3d 380, 392 (2d Cir.1999), cert. denied, —— U.S. —— , 121 S.Ct. 33 , 148 L.Ed.2d 13 (2000); cf. United States v. Girard, 601 F.2d 69, 71 (2d Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. United States
(2×)
See Tribal Governing Board of Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Thomas, 531 U.S. 811 , 121 S.Ct. 33 , 148 L.Ed.2d 13 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Real Property in Section 9, Town 29 North
See, e.g., United States v. Four Contiguous Parcels of Real Prop., Nos. 98-5292/5317, 191 F.3d 461 , 1999 WL 701914 , at 8 (6th Cir. Sept.1, 1999) (Clay, J., dissenting) ( 19 U.S.C. § 1615 violates the Due Process Clause), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 32 , 148 L.Ed.2d 13 (2000); United States v. $49,576.00 U.S. Currency, 116 F.3d 425 (9th Cir.1997); United States v. Daccarett, 6 F.3d 37 , 44-47 (2d Cir.1993); Note, Civil Forfeiture and the Excessive Fines Clause, 11 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tribal Governing Board of the Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians
v.
Thomas
v.
Thomas
No. 99-1520.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 2000.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: D. Connecticut (2)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.