green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
12.8 score
“a district court has the discretion to adopt local rules that are necessary to carry out the conduct of its business.”
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Brik v. Brodie
a district court has the discretion to adopt local rules that are necessary to carry out the conduct of its business.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
School District of Beverly v. Geller
determining public policy is a uniquely legislative endeavor, one not well suited to judicial resolution
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Kudlach, A.
See Commonwealth v. Fletcher, 750 A.2d 261, 276 ( Pa. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 (2000) (victim's statement was relevant to his state of mind regarding relationship with defendant and, therefore, admissible to prove presence of ill will, malice, or motive for killing); Commonwealth v. Puksar, 740 A.2d 219 , 225 n. 6 (Pa. 1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 829 (2000) (victim's statement that he did not trust defendant and that victim and defendant were involved in dispute admissible under state of mind exception to prove presence of ill will, malice, or motive for killing); Commonwealth v. C…
discussed
Cited "see"
Picard v. Estate of Mendelow (In re Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC)
“In determining what constitutes ‘prejudice,’ [the court] considers] whether the assertion of the new claim would: (i) require the opponent to expend significant additional resources to conduct discovery and prepare for trial; (ii) significantly delay the resolu tion of the dispute; or (iii) prevent the plaintiff from bringing a timely action in another jurisdiction.” Block, 988 F.2d. at 350 ; accord Monahan v. New York City Dep’t of Corr., 214 F.3d 275 , 284 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 623 , 148 L.Ed.2d 533 (2000); Agerbrink v. Model Serv.
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael D. Lee v. the Rogers Agency, C. Michael Rogers & New York Life Ins. Co.
See Monahan v. New York City Dep’t of Corrections, 214 F.3d 275 , 285 (2d Cir.) (observing that “literal privity is not a requirement for res judicata to apply” and that a party is bound by a prior judgment “if his interests were adequately represented by another vested with the authority of representation” (internal quotations omitted)), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 (2000). 14 defendant is not twice vexed for the same acts and achieves judicial economy by precluding those who have had a fair trial from relitigating claims.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mira v. State
See Combs [v. Coyle, 205 F.3d 269, 286 (6th Cir.2000), reh’g denied, cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 623 , 148 L.Ed.2d 533 (2000)]; [United States v. Burson, 952 F.2d 1196, 1200 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 997 , 112 S.Ct. 1702 , 118 L.Ed.2d 411 (1992)]; Coppola [v. Powell, 878 F.2d 1562, 1567 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 969 , 110 S.Ct. 418 , 107 L.Ed.2d 383 (1989)]; see also Berghuis v. Thompkins, 560 U.S. 370 , 130 S.Ct. 2250, 2260 , 176 L.Ed.2d 1098 (2010) (holding that during police interrogation right to remain silent must be invoked unambiguously)!], reh�…
discussed
Cited "see"
James Mira v. State of Indiana
See Combs [v. Coyle, 205 F.3d 269, 286 (6th Cir.2000), reh'g denied, cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 623 , 148 L.Ed.2d 533 (2000)]; [United States v. Burson, 952 F.2d 1196, 1200 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 997 , 112 S.Ct. 1702 , 118 L.Ed.2d 411 (1992)]; Coppola [v. Powell, 878 F.2d 1562, 1567 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 969 , 110 S.Ct. 418 , 107 L.Ed.2d 383 (1989)]; see also Berghuis v. Thompkins, 560 U.S. 370 , 130 S.Ct. 2250, 2260 , 176 L.Ed.2d 1098 (2010) (holding that during police interrogation right to remain silent must be invoked unambiguously)[, reh'g de…
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Molina
See Combs v. Coyle, 205 F.3d 269 (6th Cir.2000) (use of pre-arrest silence as substantive evidence of guilt is an impermissible burden on the exercise of the Fifth Amendment privilege), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 623 , 148 L.Ed.2d 533 (2000); 16 United States v. Burson, 952 F.2d 1196 (10th Cir.1991) (the use of pre-arrest, pre-Miranda silence as substantive evidence of guilt violates the Fifth Amendment), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 997 , 112 S.Ct. 1702 , 118 L.Ed.2d 411 (1992); Coppola v. Powell, 878 F.2d 1562 (1st Cir.1989) (application of the privilege is not limited to persons in c…
discussed
Cited "see"
Owens v. State
See Combs v. Coyle, 205 F.3d 269, 286 (6th Cir.2000) (defendant's pre-arrest statement to police, "talk to my lawyer," was invocation of privilege against self-incrimination, and prosecutor's closing argument comment on defendant's statement violated Fifth Amendment), cert. denied, Bagley v. Combs, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 623 , 148 L.Ed.2d 533 ; United States v. Burson, 952 F.2d 1196, 1201 (10th Cir.1991) (defendant's actions in refusing to cooperate with LR.S. criminal agents investigating a see-ond tax fraud suspect constituted an invocation of his right to remain silent and State's use in…
discussed
Cited "see"
Collier v. Brown
See DiRuzza v. County of Tehama, 206 F.3d 1304, 1314-15 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 624 , 148 L.Ed.2d 533 (2000) (summary judgment inappropriate on retaliation claim where there were disputed issues of material fact regarding whether retaliation was a substantial or motivating factor in defendants’ conduct); Chatman v. Tyner, 2009 WL 498958 , at *14 (E.D.Cal.
cited
Cited "see"
Amunrud v. Board of Appeals
See Kansas v. United States, 214 F.3d 1196, 1197 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 623 , 148 L.Ed.2d 533 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Amunrud v. Board of Appeals
See Kansas v. United States, 214 F.3d 1196, 1197 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Fletcher
See Fletcher v. Pennsylvania, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 623 , 148 L.Ed.2d 533 (2000) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
(2006)
In the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, Pub.L. 104-193 , § 369, 110 Stat. 2105 , 2251 , Congress amended that law to require "procedures under which the State has . . . authority to withhold or suspend, or to restrict the use of driver's licenses, professional and occupational licenses, and recreational and sporting licenses of individuals owing overdue support. . . ." See 42 U.S.C. § 666 (a)(16); see generally Kansas v. United States, 214 F.3d 1196 (10 th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 (2000) (upholding constitutionality of 1996 amendment).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Malloy
See Bomar, 826 A.2d at 856 (citing Commonwealth v. Fletcher, 561 Pa. 266 , 750 A.2d 261, 275 (2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 623 , 148 L.Ed.2d 533 (2000)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stephenson v. Dunford
“Notwithstanding a defendant’s failure to timely plead [a] defense, a district court may still entertain affirmative defenses at the summary judgment stage in the absence of undue prejudice to the plaintiff, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the defendant, futility, or undue delay of the proceedings.” Saks v. Franklin Covey Co., 316 F.3d 337, 350 (2d Cir.2003); accord Monahan v. New York City Dep’t of Corr., 214 F.3d 275 , 283 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 623 , 148 L.Ed.2d 533 (2000); Block v. First Blood Assocs., 988 F.2d 344, 350 (2d Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pataky v. Pataky
(2×)
In 1975, pursuant to Title 42, Chapter 7, Title IV, Part D of the Social Security Act ("Title IV-D"), Congress established the Child Support Enforcement Program ("CSE program"). 93 P.L. 647, 88 Stat. 2337 (1975); see Kansas v. United States, 214 F.3d 1196 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 623 , 148 L.Ed.2d 533 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rochelle Saks v. Franklin Covey Co. And Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc.
See Monahan v. New York City Dep’t of Corr., 214 F.3d 275 , 283 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 623 , 148 L.Ed.2d 533 (2000); Block v. First Blood Assocs., 988 F.2d 344 , 350 (2d Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Hutchinson
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Fletcher, 561 Pa. 266 , 750 A.2d 261, 276 (2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 623 , 148 L.Ed.2d 533 (2000) (victim’s statement was relevant to his state of mind regarding relationship with defendant and, therefore, admissible to prove presence of ill will, malice, or motive for killing); Commonwealth v. Puksar, 559 Pa. 358 , 740 A.2d 219 , 225 n. 6 (1999) , cert. denied, 531 U.S. 829 , 121 S.Ct. 79 , 148 L.Ed.2d 42 (2000) (victim’s statement that he did not trust defendant and that victim and defendant were involved in dispute admissible under state of mind …
discussed
Cited "see"
Eudene Eunique, an Individual v. Colin L. Powell, the Secretary of State for the United States
(2×)
See Kansas v. United States, 214 F.3d 1196, 1198, 1204 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 623 , 148 L.Ed.2d 533 (2000). 26 All of this not only illustrates the rationality of Congress's goal, but also demonstrates its rational connection to the passport denial in question.
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles L. Lorraine v. Ralph Coyle, Warden
See Combs v. Coyle, 205 F.3d 269, 276-77 (6th Cir.) (holding that the petitioner’s ineffective assistance of trial counsel claims, which were first presented in state postconviction proceeding, were not procedurally defaulted on state res judicata grounds because petitioner’s trial counsel continued to represent him with the addition of new counsel, and the potential conflict of interest was not addressed by state procedural rules in effect at the time), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 623 , 148 L.Ed.2d 533 (2000). 5 Thus, as in Combs , we are not barred from reviewing the merits b…
discussed
Cited "see"
Eudene Eunique, an Individual v. Colin L. Powell, the Secretary of State for the United States
See Kansas v. United States, 214 F.3d 1196, 1198, 1204 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 623 , 148 L.Ed.2d 533 (2000). 21 All of this not only illustrates the rationality of Congress's goal, but also demonstrates its rational connection to the passport denial in question.
cited
Cited "see"
Eunique v. Powell
See Kansas v. United States, 214 F.3d 1196, 1198, 1204 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 623 , 148 L.Ed.2d 533 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Banks
See Combs v. Coyle, 205 F.3d 269, 281 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 623 , 148 L.Ed.2d 533 (2000), where we said (citing Jenkins v. Anderson, 447 U.S. 231, 236-238 , 100 S.Ct. 2124 , 65 L.Ed.2d 86 (1980)) that “permitting the impeachment use of a defendant’s prior silence does not unconstitutionally burden the exercise of Fifth Amendment rights.” See also Seymour v. Walker, 224 F.3d 542, 560 (6th Cir.2000) (when a defendant chose to testify in her own defense, “[t]he prosecutor ... had a legitimate interest in impeaching her testimony and in not allowing Seymour to…
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Pierce
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Fletcher, 561 Pa. 266 , 750 A.2d 261 (Pa.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 623 , 148 L.Ed.2d 533 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Stallworth
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Fletcher, 561 Pa. 266, 304 , 750 A.2d 261, 282 (2000) (Saylor, J., concurring), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 623 , 148 L.Ed.2d 533 (2000); McClellan, State v. Alston, at 1356.
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Rivera
See Commonwealth v. Fletcher, 561 Pa. 266, 284 , 750 A.2d 261, 270 (2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 623 , 148 L.Ed.2d 533 (2000). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Murray v. Goord
Aug. 22, 2000) (McCurn, S.J.) (listing cases); see also Monahan v. New York City Dep’t of Corrs., 214 F.3d 275 , 292 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 623 , 148 L.Ed.2d 533 (2000) (discussing district courts’ discretion to adopt local rules like 7.1(a)(3)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mario Valente Collezioni, Ltd. v. AAK LTD.
See also, Mona-han v. New York Department of Corrections, 214 F.3d 275 , 285 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 623 , 148 L.Ed.2d 533 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pollard
Id. (citing United States v. Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111 , 100 S.Ct. 352 , 62 L.Ed.2d 259 (1979)); see also Felder v. Johnson, 204 F.3d 168, 172 (5th Cir.2000) (dismissing equitable tolling argument because “mere ignorance of the law or of statutes of limitations is insufficient to warrant tolling”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035 , 121 S.Ct. 622 , 148 L.Ed.2d 532 (2000); Turner v. Johnson, 177 F.3d 390, 392 (5th Cir.1999) (noting that “neither a plaintiffs unfamiliarity with the legal process nor his lack of representation during the applicable filing period merits equitable tolling”). 7 Becau…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robinson
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 00-5251.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 4, 2000.
Published
Citer courts: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial… (1) · E.D. New York (1)
C. A. Fed. Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ante, p. 808] denied.