green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Blair v. City of Evansville, Ind.
See United States v. Scheets, 188 F.3d 829, 836 (7th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1096 , 120 S.Ct. 837 , 145 L.Ed.2d 703 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Singletary
See United States v. Richardson, 195 F.3d 192, 198 (4th Cir.1999) (providing standard and noting that ineffective assistance of counsel claims generally should be raised by motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001)), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1096 , 120 S.Ct. 837 , 145 L.Ed.2d 704 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Singletary
See United States v. Richardson, 195 F.3d 192, 198 (4th Cir. 1999) (providing standard and noting that ineffective assistance of counsel claims generally should be raised by motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001)), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1096 (2000). *After reviewing the pro se supplemental brief, we conclude that the claims raised therein are barred by Singletary’s knowing and voluntary waiver of his right to appeal.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Burgess
See United States v. Richardson, 195 F.3d 192, 198 (4th Cir.1999) (providing standard and noting that ineffective assistance of counsel claims generally should be raised by motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001)), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1096 , 120 S.Ct. 837 , 145 L.Ed.2d 704 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bussey
See United States v. Richardson, 195 F.3d 192, 198 (4th Cir.1999) (providing standard and noting that ineffective assistance of counsel claims generally should be raised by motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000)), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1096 , 120 S.Ct. 837 , 145 L.Ed.2d 704 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kotmair
See United States v. Richardson, 195 F.3d 192, 198 (4th Cir.1999), cert, denied, 528 U.S. 1096 , 120 S.Ct. 837 , 145 L.Ed.2d 704 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ball
See United States v. Scheets, 188 F.3d 829, 839-40 (7th Cir.1999) (finding consent voluntary despite apparent intoxication where there was no evidence in record that defendant was not aware of what he was doing or failed to appreciate significance of his actions), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1096 , 120 S.Ct. 837 , 145 L.Ed.2d 703 (2000); United States v. Gipp, 147 F.3d 680, 686 (8th Cir.1998) (same); United States v. Gay, 774 F.2d 368, 376-77 (10th Cir.1985) (finding consent voluntary even though defendant was intoxicated, staggered, swayed, and slurred his speech).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Strachan
See United States v. Richardson, 195 F.3d 192, 197 (4th Cir.1999) (“In construing § 201(c)(2) as we do, we join the unanimous conclusion of circuit courts that have ruled over the past year that the government does not violate § 201(c)(2) by granting immunity or leniency or entering into plea agreements to obtain testimony.”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1096 , 120 S.Ct. 837 , 145 L.Ed.2d 704 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Huron
See United States v. Richardson, 195 F.3d 192, 198 (4th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1096 , 120 S.Ct. 837 , 145 L.Ed.2d 704 (2000); United States v. King, 119 F.3d 290, 295 (4th Cir.1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Walters
See, e.g., United States v. Scheets, 188 F.3d 829, 838 (7th Cir. 1999) (finding that the officers’ questions “were specifically tailored to establish [the defendant’s] identity and either to confirm or dispel the officers’ suspicions regarding [the defendant’s] involvement in the bank robbery”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1096 , 120 S. Ct. 837 , 145 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lewis
See, e.g., United States v. Scheets, 188 F.3d 829, 838 (7th Cir. 1999) (finding that the officers’ questions “were specifically tailored to establish [the defendant’s] identity and either to confirm or dispel the officers’ suspicions regarding [the defendant’s] involvement in the bank robbery”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1096 , 120 S. Ct. 837 , 145 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bagley
v.
Cuniff
v.
Cuniff
No. 99-7149.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 2000.
Published
Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.