Kansas v. Nebraska, 528 U.S. 1151 (2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Kansas v. Nebraska, 528 U.S. 1151 (2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · "[l]eading a drug-sniffing dog around a car cannot be justified by reference to a desire to detect traffic violations, * * * the purpose of the roadblocks [here] is to catch drug offenders"
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: People v. Ortiz (illappct, 2000-11-01)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) People v. Ortiz (2×)
Ill. App. Ct. · 2000 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
eading a drug-sniffing dog around a car cannot be justified by reference to a desire to detect traffic violations, the purpose of the roadblocks is to catch drug offenders
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) People v. Ortiz
Ill. App. Ct. · 2000 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
eading a drug-sniffing dog around a car cannot be justified by reference to a desire to detect traffic violations, the purpose of the roadblocks is to catch drug offenders
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kansas
v.
Nebraska
No. 126.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 2000.
528 U.S. 1151
Published
3 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 76%
Citer courts: Appellate Court of Illinois (3)

First Report of the Special Master received and ordered filed. Exceptions to the Report, with supporting briefs, may be filed by the parties within 45 days. Replies, if any, with supporting briefs may be filed within 80 days. [For earlier order herein, see, e. g., ante, p. 1001.]