green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.8 score
“we" and "they”
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Johnson
However, relying primarily on decisions of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals —United States v. Edwards, 159 F.3d 1117 (8th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 825 , 120 S.Ct. 309, 310, 75 (1999), and United States v. Emery, 186 F.3d 921 (8th Cir.1999) — this court held that “Johnson has been charged in Counts 1 through 5 with murders that are ‘punishable by death,’ whether or not a constitutionally effective death penalty was available, on procedural grounds, at the time that she allegedly committed the offenses.” Johnson, 239 F.Supp.2d at 905 (emphasis in the original).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Collins
See United States v. Edwards, 159 F.3d 1117 , 1124-26 (8th Cir.1998) (use of "we”, "they”, "someone” and "others”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 825 , 120 S.Ct. 309 , 145 L.Ed.2d 64 (1999); United States v. Jones, 101 F.3d 1263 , 1270 & n. 5 (8th Cir.1996) ("we” and "they”), cert. denied,; United States v. Williams, 936 F.2d 698, 700-01 (2d Cir.1991) ("another guy”); United States v. Briscoe, 896 F.2d 1476, 1502 (7th Cir.) ("we”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 863 , 111 S.Ct. 173 , 112 L.Ed.2d 137 (1990); United States v. Garcia, 836 F.2d 385, 390-91 (8th Cir.1987) ("someone”). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Dickerson, A.K.A. Lane, A.K.A. Frank Dixon
See City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chems., Inc., 158 F.3d 548 , 556 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 812 , 120 S.Ct. 309 , 145 L.Ed.2d 42 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dickerson
See City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chems., Inc., 158 F.3d 548, 556 (11th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 812 , 120 S. Ct. 309 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blomkest Fertilizer, Inc. v. Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc.
See City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chems., Inc., 158 F.3d 548 , 570-73 (11th Cir.1998) (incumbency rate on new contracts so high it was inconsistent with independent action), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 309 , 145 L.Ed.2d 42 (1999). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hahnaman Albrecht v. Potash Corporation
See City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chems., Inc., 158 F.3d 548, 570-73 (11th Cir. 1998) (incumbency rate on new contracts so high it was inconsistent with independent action), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 309 (1999). -28- On the other hand, acts that would be irrational or contrary to the defendant's economic interest if no conspiracy existed, but which would be rational if the alleged agreement existed, do tend to exclude the possibility of innocence.
discussed
Cited "see"
Blomkest Fertilizer, Inc. Cobden Grain & Feed, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated Hahnaman Albrecht, Inc. John Peterson, Doing Business as Almelund Feed & Grain Laing-Gro Fertilizers, Inc. Clearbrook Ag Service, Inc., on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated Reamford Liquid Fertilizer, Inc., on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated Tolley's Inc., on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated James River Farm Service, Inc., on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated Angela Coleman, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated Ag Network, Inc. Marcelline Farm Supply, Inc., on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan, Inc. Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Sales, Inc. Potash Company of America, Inc. Imc Fertilizer Group, Inc. Kalium Chemicals, Ltd. Kalium Canada, Ltd. Noranda Minerals, Inc. Central Canada Potash Co. Noranda Sales Corporation, Ltd. Cominco, Ltd. Cominco American, Inc. Eddy Potash, Inc. New Mexico Potash Corporation Rio Algom, Ltd. Ppg Canada, Limited Ppg Industries, Inc. Imc Global
See City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chems., Inc., 158 F.3d 548, 570-73 (11th Cir. 1998) (incumbency rate on new contracts so high it was inconsistent with independent action), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 309 (1999). 14 Another memorandum in the same time frame prepared by a Noranda employee states: "Casual conversation at the SMA meeting with a fairly senior PCS guy got quite pointed about 'market correction plan' and he was happy to indicate that they could do it again . . . .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Marsh and McLennan Companies, Inc.
Kan. 1998); see also Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc., 158 F.3d 548, 566-67 (11th Cir. 1998) *476 (statistician’s testimony is admissible as circumstantial evidence to indicate collusive behavior in state’s chlorine marketplace), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 812 , 120 S. Ct. 309 , 145 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Peeler
See, e.g., Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc., 158 F.3d 548, 559 (11th Cir. 1998) (“[a] statement that merely discloses the existence of a conspiracy to a non-conspirator, that merely ‘spills the beans,’ with no intention of recruiting the [nonconspirator] into the conspiracy does not further the conspiracy”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 812 , 120 S. Ct. 309 , 145 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Arnold
See also, U.S. v. Castro, 166 F.3d 728 (5th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 827 , 120 S.Ct. 309 , 145 L.Ed.2d 66 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Flat Glass Antitrust Litigation
Indeed, “regression and statistical analysis have been admitted in antitrust cases to prove injury and to determine damages.” Id. (finding use of multiple regression analysis reliable under Rule 702); see also City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chems., Inc., 158 F.3d 548 , 566 (11th Cir.1998) (expert’s compilation of data from business records and analysis with simple arithmetic, algebra, and multiple regression analysis is well-established as a reliable methodology), reh’g en banc denied, 172 F.3d 884 (11th Cir.), and cert. denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 309 , 145 L.Ed.2d 42 (1999); Askew v…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cross
v.
California Cooper v. California
v.
California Cooper v. California
No. 98-9308; No. 98-9504.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1999.
Cited by 25 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D. South Dakota (1)
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist.; and
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and eases remanded for further consideration in light of Lilly v. Virginia, 527 U.S. 116 (1999).