green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Russell James Hodge, Also Known as Rusty Hodge, Appellant/cross-Appellee
See United States v. Buckendahl, 251 F.3d 753 , 762 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1049 , 122 S.Ct. 633 , 151 L.Ed.2d 553 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary Lynn Moeller
See United States v. Wilkerson, 179 F.3d 1083, 1086 (8th Cir.1999); accord United *713 States v. Buckendahl, 251 F.3d 753 , 762 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1049 , 122 S.Ct. 633 , 151 L.Ed.2d 553 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronnie Rogers
See United States v. Buckendahl, 251 F.3d 753 , 759 (8th Cir.) (noting that sentencing disparities between coconspirators do not serve as proper bases for sentencing reduction), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1049 , 122 S.Ct. 633 , 151 L.Ed.2d 553 (2001); Nguyen v. United States, 114 F.3d 699, 704 (8th Cir.1997) (“[T]here is no constitutional right to plea bargain.”) (internal marks and citation omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnson
See United States v. Stewart, 256 F.3d 231, 252 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 122 S.Ct. 633 , 151 L.Ed.2d 553 (2001) (holding that, if the evidence concerning drug quantity is uncontested and overwhelming, the defendant’s substantial rights are not affected by the failure to instruct the jury on that element of the offense); see also United States v. Montgomery, 262 F.3d 233, 252 (4th Cir.2001), cert. denied, — U.S.—, 122 S.Ct. 845 , 151 L.Ed.2d 723 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Feurtado
See United States v. Stewart, 256 F.3d 231 (4th Cir.2001), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 633 , 151 L.Ed.2d 553 (2001); United States v. Santiesteban, 825 F.2d 779, 783 (4th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dade
See United States v. Stewart, 256 F.3d 231, 252 (4th Cir.) (holding that, even if sentence was plainly erroneous, substantial rights are not affected when the evidence implicating a defendant in an aggravated drug offense was “uncontested and overwhelming”), ce rt. denied, — U.S. —, 122 S.Ct. 633 , 151 L.Ed.2d 553 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Burl
See United States v. Stewart, 256 F.3d 231, 252-53 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, Simms v. United States, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 633 , — L.Ed.3d - (2001); United States v. White, 238 F.3d 537, 543 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 121 S.Ct. 2235 , 150 L.Ed.2d 225 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Chase
See, e.g., United States v. Stew- art, 256 F.3d 231 , 257 (4th Cir.) (holding that imposition of sentences UNITED STATES v. CHASE 7 exceeding statutory maximum did not violate substantial rights because district court was obliged to stack sentences for grouped offenses to achieve same total punishment), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 633 (2001); see also United States v. Feola, 275 F.3d 216, 219 (2d Cir. 2001) (per curiam) (explaining sentencing procedure for multiple counts, including both grouping and stacking).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jermaine Lavonne Chase
See, e.g., United States v. Stewart, 256 F.3d 231, 257 (4th *252 Cir.) (holding that imposition of sentences exceeding statutory maximum did not violate substantial rights because district court was obliged to stack sentences for grouped offenses to achieve same total punishment), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 633 , 151 L.Ed.2d 553 (2001); see also United States v. Feola, 275 F.3d 216, 219 (2d Cir.2001) (per curiam) (explaining sentencing procedure for multiple counts, including both grouping and stacking).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Duffy
See, e.g., United States v. Stewart, 256 F.3d 231, 252 (4th Cir.) (explaining that plain error will be noticed only if, inter alia, the error affects the defendant’s substantial rights), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 633 , 151 L.Ed.2d 553 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Edwards
v.
Bogan, Warden
v.
Bogan, Warden
No. 01-6752.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 26, 2001.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. • Certiorari denied.