green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Calvin Wayne Buckland
But see United States v. Cotton, 261 F.3d 397, 403-04 (4th Cir.2001), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 803 , 151 L.Ed.2d 689 (2002) (holding that “failure to charge drug quantity in the indictment and submit it to the jury” seriously affects the fairness, integrity and public reputation of judicial proceedings so that the court should “exercise[its] discretion to recognize the error”).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Calvin Wayne Buckland
(2×)
But see United States v. Cotton, 261 F.3d 397, 403-04 (4th Cir.2001), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 803 , 151 L.Ed.2d 689 (2002) (holding that “failure to charge drug quantity in the indictment and submit it to the jury” seriously affects the fairness, integrity and public reputation of judicial proceedings so that the court should “exercise[its] discretion to recognize the error”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Calvin Trennell, A/K/A Meechie
See United States v. Cotton, 261 F.3d 397, 407 (4th Cir.2001), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 803 , 151 L.Ed.2d 689 (2002) (argued April 15, 2002); 3 United States v. Gonzalez, 259 F.3d 355 , 361 n. 3 (5th Cir.2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Trennell, Calvin
See United States v. Cotton, 261 F.3d 397, 407 (4th Cir. 2001), cert. granted, ___ U.S. ___, 122 S.Ct. 803 , 151 L.Ed.2d 689 (2002) (argued April 15, 2002);/3 United States v. Gonzalez, 259 F.3d 355 , 361 n.3 (5th Cir. 2001).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Newbill
See United States v. Cotton, 261 F.3d 397 (4th Cir.2001), cert. granted, — U.S. --, 122 S.Ct. 803 , 151 L.Ed.2d 689 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnson
See United States v. Cotton, 261 F.3d 397, 404-05 (4th Cir.2001) (defining nature of Apprendi error as a defect in the indictment), cert. granted, — U.S. —, 122 S.Ct. 803 , — L.Ed.2d — (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rosenblatt v. Ernst & Young International, Ltd.
See Chase Manhattan Bank v. Traffic Stream (BVI), 251 F.3d 334 (2d Cir.2001) (per curiam) (holding that corporation is not a citizen or subject of a foreign state under § 1332(a)(2)), cert. denied, No. 01-651, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 198 (Jan. 4, 2002). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bellamy
See United States v. Cotton, 261 F.3d 397, 410 (4th Cir.2001) (noting that questioning during lawful encounter assisted officers in realizing that incriminating character of an item was immediately apparent), cert. granted on other grounds, — U.S.—, 122 S.Ct. 803 , — L.Ed.2d — (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Garcia-Restrepo
Id. at 160 ; see also United States v. Cotton, 261 F.3d 397, 403-04 (4th Cir.2001) (holding that imposition of a sentence greater than that allowed for defendant’s conviction must be noticed on plain error review), cert. granted, — U.S. —-, 122 S.Ct. 803 , 151 L.Ed.2d 689 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chase Manhattan Bank
v.
Traffic Stream (BVI) Infrastructure Ltd.
v.
Traffic Stream (BVI) Infrastructure Ltd.
No. 01-651.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 4, 2002.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of Government of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari granted.