Trowbridge v. Hanks, 534 U.S. 961 (2001). · Go Syfert
Trowbridge v. Hanks, 534 U.S. 961 (2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: A.B. Doe, a minor child by and through her parent(s) individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Jerome Adams, M.D., in his capacity as the Indiana State Health Commissioner (indctapp, 2016-04-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." A.B. Doe, a minor child by and through her parent(s) individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Jerome Adams, M.D., in his capacity as the Indiana State Health Commissioner
Ind. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
The Smith Court rejected that contention, holding that a defendant has “a legitimate expectation of privacy in his body and blood samples at the time they [are] taken[,]” but once the DNA is used to create a profile, the profile becomes the property of the Crime Tab, and the defendant “has no possesso-ry or ownership interest in it.” Id.; see also Patterson v. State, 742 N.E.2d 4, 11 (Ind.Ct.App.2000) (once blood sample is lawfully obtained, defendant did not have reasonable expectation of privacy in his blood sample and reuse of his DNA sample in subsequent unrelated criminal investig…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Trowbridge
v.
Hanks, Superintendent, Wabash Valley Correctional Facility
No. 01-5690.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 2001.
534 U.S. 961
Published

C. A. 7th Cir. Certio-rari denied.