green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.9 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. May
a confession may not be found involuntary absent some type of coercive activity on the part of law enforcement officials.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Monreal
See United States v. Sriyuth, 98 F.3d 739, 750 (3d Cir.l996)(court found waiver valid where Thai immigrant was read warnings in English but lived in the United States for nine years), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1141 , 117 S.Ct. 1016 , 136 L.Ed.2d 892 (1997). 5 .See, e.g., Correll v. Thompson, 63 F.3d 1279, 1288 (4th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1035 , 116 S.Ct. 688 , 133 L.Ed.2d 593 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Moreno
See United States v. Sriyuth, 98 F.3d 739, 750 (3d Cir.1996) (valid waiver where Thai immigrant was read warnings only in English but had lived in the United States for nine years), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1141 , 117 S.Ct. 1016 , 136 L.Ed.2d 892 (1997). 6 .
cited
Cited "see"
Margaret NICHOLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-Appellee
See United States v. Kime, 99 F.3d 870, 884-85 (8th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1141 , ----, 117 S.Ct. 1015 , 136 L.Ed.2d 892 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cole
See, e.g., United States v. Kime, 99 F.3d 870, 877 (8th Cir.1996) (an instruction that a reasonable doubt is one that fairly and naturally arises from the evidence or lack of evidence produced by the government is legally correct, and may be useful, but is not necessarily required, if other instructions effectively communicate the point), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1141 , 117 S.Ct. 1015 , 136 L.Ed.2d 892 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rutherford
“A violation of section 841(a)(1) occurs when the government proves beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant possessed and intended to distribute a ‘controlled substance,’ regardless of whether that substance is cocaine or cocaine base.” See United States v. Williams, 876 F.2d 1521, 1525 (11th Cir.1989); see also United States v. Mejia, 97 F.3d 1391, 1392-93 (11th Cir.1996) (to satisfy elements of sections 846 and 841(a)(1), government need not prove particular substance involved, only that some controlled substance involved), cert denied, 519 U.S. 1141 , 117 S.Ct. 1016 , 136 L.Ed.2d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rutherford
“A violation of section 841(a)(1) occurs when the government proves beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant possessess and intended to distribute a ‘controlled substance,’ regardless of whether that substance is cocaine or cocaine base.” See United States v. Williams, 876 F.2d 1521,1525 (11th Cir. 1989); see also United States v. Mejia, 97 F.3d 1391,1392-93 (11th Cir. 1996) (to satisfy elements of sections 846 and 841(a)(1), government need not prove particular substance involved, only that some controlled substance involved), cert denied, 519 U.S. 1141 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Denetclaw
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 96-7522.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 18, 1997.
Published
Citer courts: D. Minnesota (1)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.