Rio Tinto PLC v. Sarei, 569 U.S. 945 (2013). · Go Syfert
Search
Rio Tinto PLC v. Sarei, 569 U.S. 945 (2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mohammadi v. Islamic Republic of Iran (dcd, 2013-05-31)
Treatment trajectory · 2013 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2013 2019 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Mohammadi v. Islamic Republic of Iran
D.D.C. · 2013 · confidence medium
Related to this issue, five days after the Supreme Court decided Kiobel , the Court vacated a decision in a case called Rio Tinto PLC v. Sarei and remanded the case "for further consideration in light of [Kiobel}." See-U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1995 , -, 185 L.Ed.2d 863 , 2013 WL 1704704, at *1 (2013).
cited Cited "see" Doe I v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
9th Cir. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See 569 U.S. 945 (2013).
cited Cited "see" Lenai Mull v. Motion Picture Industry Health
9th Cir. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See 569 U.S. 945 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
RIO TINTO PLC
v.
Alexis Holyweek SAREI
No. 11–649..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 22, 2013.
569 U.S. 945
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published

Motion of Government of Australia, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of Professors of International Law, Foreign Relations Law and Federal Jurisdiction for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of Washington Legal Foundation, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of National Foreign Trade Council, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 569 U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 1659, 185 L.Ed.2d 671 (2013).

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions and this petition.