(HC) Barth v. Lazarraga (E.D. Cal. 2019). · Go Syfert
(HC) Barth v. Lazarraga (E.D. Cal. 2019). Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
(HC) Barth
v.
Lazarraga
2:19-cv-02556.
District Court, E.D. California.
Dec 16, 2019.
Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHAWN DAMON BARTH, 11 Case No. 19-05223 BLF (PR) Petitioner, 12 ORDER OF TRANSER v.

JOE A. LAZARRAGA, Warden, Respondent.

Petitioner, a state prisoner, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging a disciplinary action that resulted in the loss of credits while he was housed at the Mule Creek Prison in Ione. (Docket No. 1-3 at 8-21.) Venue for a habeas action is proper in either the district of confinement or the district of conviction, 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Federal courts in California traditionally have chosen to hear petitions challenging a conviction or sentence in the district of conviction or sentencing. See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b)(1); Dannenberg v. Ingle, 831 F. Supp. 767, 768 (N.D. Cal. 1993); Laue v. Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). But if the petition challenges the manner in which a sentence is being executed, e.g., if it involves parole or time credits claims, the district of confinement is the preferable forum. See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b)(2); 1 Here, Petitioner 1s challenging a disciplinary action that resulted in the loss of 2 credits, (Docket No. 1-3 at 19), which makes the district of confinement the preferable 3 || forum. /d. Petitioner is currently confined at the California Medical Facility in Vacaville. 4 || (Docket No. 8 at 1.) Vacaville is located in Solano County, which lies within the Eastern 5 || District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 84(b). Therefore, the preferred venue for this 6 |} action is in that district and not in this one. See id.; Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a)(1). 7 || Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the g || Eastern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b)(1). 9 The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and transfer the entire file to the 10 || Eastern District of California. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 || Dated: December 16, 2019 Lloua harm) 1 BETH LABSON FREEMAN 3 United States District Judge

15 16 & Z 18

PRO. SEBLIHC. 19\05223Barth_transfer(ED)