Breiner v. Pollard (N.D. Cal. 2021). · Go Syfert
Breiner v. Pollard (N.D. Cal. 2021). Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Breiner
v.
Pollard
5:21-cv-03762.
District Court, N.D. California.
Jun 11, 2021.
Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JACK LEE BREINER, Case No. 21-03762 NC (PR)

Petitioner, ORDER OF TRANSFER v . WARDEN M. POLLARD. Respondents.

Petitioner, a state prisoner at R.J. Donovan State Prison in San Diego, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges his state conviction from the Superior Court of Modoc County. Venue for a habeas action is proper in either the district of confinement or the district of conviction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). However, petitions challenging a conviction or sentence are preferably heard in the district of conviction. See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b)(1); Laue v. Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). Here, because petitioner challenges a conviction from Modoc County, the Eastern District of California is the district of conviction.

1 Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the 2 Eastern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). The Clerk shall terminate all pending 3 motions and transfer the entire file to the Eastern District of California. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED.

5 DATED: June 11, 2021 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS 6 United States Magistrate Judge