Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago, & St. Louis Ry. v. Lightheiser, 212 U.S. 560 (1909). · Go Syfert
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago, & St. Louis Ry. v. Lightheiser, 212 U.S. 560 (1909). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago, & St. Louis Railway Company, in Error
v.
George W. Lightheiser. No 141. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago, & St. Louis Railway Company, in Error v. Thomas Collins. No 142. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago, & St. Louis Railway Company, in Error v. William R. Ross. No 178. Supreme Court of the United States December 7, 1908 Mr. Allen Zollars for in Error. Mr. Stewart T. McConnell for in Error. Djq Per Curiam: Writs of Error Severally Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction. Tullis v. Lake Erie & W. R. Co. 175 U. S. 348, 44 L. Ed. 192, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 136 Pittsburgh, C. C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Lightheiser, 168 Ind. 438, 78 N. E. 1033 Pittsburgh, C. C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Collins, 168 Ind. 467, 80 N. E. 415 Pittsburgh, C. C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Ross, 169 Ind. 3, 80 N. E. 845. Clevenger v. Chaney [29sct688,212us562,53led652] 29 S.CT. 688 212 U.S. 562 53 L.ED. 652 E. E. Clevenger, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Etc. v. Allen Chaney. No 221. E. E. Clevenger, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Etc. v. James D. Lyle. No 222. E. E. Clevenger, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Etc. v. Emily M. Nichols. No 223
Nos. 221, 222, and 223.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 4, 1909.
212 U.S. 560
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

212 U.S. 560

29 S.Ct. 688

53 L.Ed. 652

PITTSBURGH, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO, & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
GEORGE W. LIGHTHEISER. NO 141. PITTSBURGH, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO, & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. THOMAS COLLINS. NO 142. PITTSBURGH, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO, & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. WILLIAM R. ROSS. NO 178. Supreme Court of the United States December 7, 1908 Mr. Allen Zollars for plaintiff in error. Mr. Stewart T. McConnell for defendants in error. djQ Per Curiam: Writs of error severally dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Tullis v. Lake Erie & W. R. Co. 175 U. S. 348, 44 L. ed. 192, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 136; Pittsburgh, C. C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Lightheiser, 168 Ind. 438, 78 N. E. 1033; Pittsburgh, C. C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Collins, 168 Ind. 467, 80 N. E. 415; Pittsburgh, C. C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Ross, 169 Ind. 3, 80 N. E. 845. Clevenger v. Chaney [29SCt688,212US562,53LEd652] 29 S.Ct. 688 212 U.S. 562 53 L.Ed. 652 E. E. CLEVENGER, Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc., Appellant, v. ALLEN CHANEY. NO 221. E. E. CLEVENGER, Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc., Appellant, v. JAMES D. LYLE. NO 222. E. E. CLEVENGER, Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc., Appellant, v. EMILY M. NICHOLS. NO 223.

Nos. 221, 222, and 223

December 14, 1908.

1

Messrs. E. E. Clevenger and Cook Danford for appellant.

2

Mr. A. H. Mitchell for appellees.

3

Per Curiam: Appeals dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Applications for Certiorari denied. Chapman v. Bowen, 207 U. S. 89, 52 L. ed. 116, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 32.