Murray v. Atty Genl of MD (4th Cir. 1997). · Go Syfert
Murray v. Atty Genl of MD (4th Cir. 1997). Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Murray
v.
Atty Genl of MD
97-6995.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Oct 9, 1997.
Unpublished
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6995

CHRISTOPHER I. MURRAY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND;
U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE;
BENEDICT I. FERRO, District Director; JAMES D.
HOLLIS, Deportation Officer,
Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-97- 1704-AMD)

Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 9, 1997

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher I. Murray, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order declining to issue a writ of mandamus under 28 U.S.C. § 1361 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order. See 8 U.S.C.A. § 1252a(a)(3)(B) (West Supp. 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

[*2]