Cornell v. Bennett (D.S.D. 2021). · Go Syfert
Cornell v. Bennett (D.S.D. 2021). Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cornell
v.
Bennett
4:21-cv-04056.
District Court, D. South Dakota.
Jul 21, 2021.
Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA ~— . SOUTHERN DIVISION

DAVID ALLEN CORNELL, 4:21-CV-04056-RAL Petitioner, vs. OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS K. BENNETT, WARDEN YANKTON FPC, Respondent.

On April 7, 2021, David Allen Cornell, an inmate at the Yankton Federal Prison Camp in Yankton, South Dakota, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Doc. 1. Respondent moves to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, for failure to state a claim, and for failure to exhaust. Doc. 12. Comell opposes the motion. Doc. 15. Cornell seeks the “immediate application of [his] earned time credits” and claims that he ‘ is entitled to immediate release. Doc. 1 at 8. Under the First Step Act (FSA) time credits may be earned by eligible prisoners who successfully complete “evidence-based recidivism reduction programming” or “productive activities.” 18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(A). The Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has a phase-in period until January 15, 2022, to provide evidence-based recidivism programs and productive activities to all prisoners. Id. § 3621 (h)(2) (emphasis added). In Holt v. Warden, this Court held that it cannot force the BOP to apply earned time credits toward ; prerelease custody before January 15, 2022. No. 20-4064, 2021 WL 1925503, at *5-6 (D.S.D. May 13, 2021). Thus, an inmate that seeks to have the Court compel the BOP to apply the credits

before January 15, 2022, does not have standing and his/her petition must be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See id. Here, Cornell seeks the immediate application of his earned time credits. See Doc. 1 at 8. In his opposition to Respondent’s motion, Cornell relies on the minority position, Goodman v. Ortiz, Civ. No. 20-7582, 2020 WL 5015613 (D.N.J. Aug. 25, 2020), to support his proposition that his earned time credits must be applied due to the FSA’s statutory language. Doc. 15. But this Court already considered Goodman and specifically sided with the majority position and against Goodman’s interpretation of the FSA. See Holt, 2020 WL 5015613 at *5. At this time, the Court cannot compel the BOP to apply earned time credits. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that Respondent’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Doc. 12, is granted. DATED July , 2021 BY THE COURT: bslGee ROBERTO A. LANGE CHIEF JUDGE