IO at Tech Ridge, LP (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2020). · Go Syfert
IO at Tech Ridge, LP (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2020). Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
IO at Tech Ridge, LP
17-11540.
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas.
Feb 13, 2020.
Unknown

S BANKR is ce Qs |S Bre IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED and DECREED that the “aie ky .- . . below described is SO ORDERED. ac &. Dated: February 13, 2020. i ee TONY M. DAVIS UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION IN RE: § CASE NO. 17-11540-tmd IO at TECH RIDGE, LP, § Debtor. § CHAPTER 11 AMENDED RULING ON 11 U.S.C§363(f) ISSUE On March 1, 2018, the Debtor moved for approval of the sale of its primary asset, an apartment complex, free and clear of liens [ECF No. 75]. A hearing on the motion was conducted on March 20, 2018. After the hearing, briefing on how the Court should apply 11 US.C. $363(f) to the potential sale was requested. Section 363(f)(3) allows for the sale of property free and clear of interests in the property if “such interest is a lien and the price at which such property is to be sold is greater than the aggregate value of all liens on such property.” Consistent with the In re Terrance Gardens Park Partnership! and In re Boston Generating, LLC? opinions, the Court interprets subsection (f)(3)

‘In re Terrance Gardens Partnership, 96 B.R. 707, 712-13 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 1989). 2 In re Boston Generating, LLC, 440 B.R. 302, 332-33 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2010). to mean that the sales price “must be equal to or greater than the aggregate value of the liens asserted against it, not their amount.”3 # # #

3 In re Berker Industries Corp., 63 B.R. 474, 476 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1986). But see Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. Knupfer (In re PW, LLC), 391 B.R. 25 (9th Cir. BAP 2008) (interpreting “value” as used in subsection (f)(3) to refer to the total face amount of all the liens on the property); In re Flour City Bagels, LLC, 557 BR. 53, 88 (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. 2016) (same). Because the sale may go forward if any of the subsections of section 363(f) are met, the Court does not reach the subsection (f)(5) issue. 11 U.S.C. § 363(f); GSL of Ill, LLC v. McCaffety Elec. Co. (In re Demany Int’l, LLC), 471 B.R. 510 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2012).