green
Positive treatment
46.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2013 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2013
2019
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
State of Florida v. Leo Louis Kaczmar, III & Leo Louis Kaczmar, III v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
(7×)
also: Cited "see"
Id. at 1007-08.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
GLENN JACKSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
The supreme court has answered that question in Kaczmar v. State, 104 So. 3d 990, 1005-06 (Fla. 2012), concluding that it is not fundamental error: Kaczmar contends that the trial court fundamentally erred in not sua sponte providing a special jury instruction on heat of passion.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Enoch D Hall v. State of Florida
We note that our conclusion in this regard is also consistent with our pre-Hurst precedent in Kaczmar v. State, 104 So. 3d 990, 1008 (Fla. 2012), where we held that, upon striking the CCP and felony-murder aggravating factors so that only one valid aggravating factor remained, such error was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Nock v. State
The purpose of the rule is to “avoid the potential for creating misleading impressions by taking statements out of context.” Kaczmar v. State, 104 So.3d 990, 1000-01 (Fla. 2012) (quoting Larzelere v. State, 676 So.2d 394, 401 (Fla. 1996)).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Leo Louis Kaczmar, III v. State of Florida
(6×)
also: Cited "see"
STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS We previously set forth the relevant facts in Kaczmar v. State, 104 So. 3d 990, 995-98 (Fla. 2012).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Zachary Taylor Wood v. State of Florida
(2×)
We note that our conclusion in this regard is also consistent with our pre-Hurst precedent in Kaczmar v. State, 104 So. 3d 990, 1008 (Fla. 2012), where we held - 31 - that, upon striking the CCP and felony-murder aggravating factors so that only one valid aggravating factor remained, such error was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Tavares David Calloway v. State of Florida
Kaczmar v. State, 104 So.3d 990, 1000 (Fla. 2012) (citing § 90.803(18), Fla. Stat. (2007)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Joseph Edward Jordan v. State of Florida Corrected Opinion
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
We have held that “[i]t is appropriate for an attorney who does not misstate the law to relate it to the facts of the case in closing argument.” Kaczmar v. State, 104 So. 3d 990, 1006 (Fla. 2012).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Joseph Edward Jordan v. State of Florida
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
We have held that “[i]t is appropriate for an attorney who does not mis *928 state the law to relate it to the facts of the case in closing argument.” Kaczmar v. State, 104 So.3d 990, 1006 (Fla.2012).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)
(3×)
E.g., Commonwealth v. Knox, 105 A.3d 1194, 1197-1198 (Pa.2014); Batiste v. State, 121 So.3d 808, 840 (Miss.2013); Kaczmar v. State, 104 So.3d 990, 1003 (Fla.2012); State v. Santiago, 305 Conn. 101 , 183, 49 A.3d 566 (2012), citing State v. Chapman, 229 Conn. 529, 539 , 643 A.2d 1213 (1994); State v. Fortune, 2011 ME 125 , 34 A.3d 1115, ¶ 29 ; People v. Becoats, 17 N.Y.3d 643, 654 , 934 N.Y.S.2d 737 , 958 N.E.2d 865 (2011); State v. Berry, 227 W.Va. 221, 230 , 707 S.E.2d 831 (2011); State v. Mailman, 148 N.M. 702 , 2010-NMSC-036 , 242 P.3d 269, ¶ 11 ; Inyamah v. United States, 956 A.2d 58, 62…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
McCoy v. State
For example, in Kaczmar v. State, 104 So.3d 990, 1006-07 (Fla.2012), this Court agreed with the defendant’s argument that the murder was not “cold” because he was “not planning to kill” the victim but instead “killed her in a frenzied rage.” In Russ v. State, 73 So.3d 178, 193 (Fla.2011), we rejected a challenge to the “cold” element of CCP, but explained as the basis for doing so that “the murder was premeditated” and described how the defendant “waited inside of [the victim’s] home for at least eight or nine hours, during which he had time to calmly reflect prior to…
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Calhoun v. State
Kaczmar v. State, 104 So.3d 990, 1000-01 (Fla.2012) (alterations in original).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sonny Boy Oats, Jr. v. Julie L. Jones, etc.
(2×)
See Kaczmar v. State, 104 So.3d 990, 1008 (Fla. 2012); see also Wood v. State, 209 So.3d 1217, 1234 (Fla. 2017).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
SCOTT MCDERMOTT vs STATE OF FLORIDA
We affirm on all such matters without further discussion. 5 communications privilege . . . .”)); see also Kaczmar v. State, 104 So. 3d 990, 999 (Fla. 2012) (noting that a claim of husband-wife privilege is reviewed for an abuse of discretion).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michael Allen GRIFFIN
v.
STATE of Florida
v.
STATE of Florida
No. SC11-1271.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Aug 30, 2012.
Terri Lynn Backhus of Backhus & Iza-kowitz, P.A., Tampa, FL, for Appellant., Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, and Sandra Sue Jaggard, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, FL, for Appellee.
Canady, Labarga, Lewis, Pariente, Perry, Polston, Quince.
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Walton v. State, 77 So.3d 639 (Fla.2011).
It is so ordered.
POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.