green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.7 score
“matters of public record may be considered, including pleadings, orders, and other papers filed with the court or records of administrative bodies.”
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dufrane v. Navient Solutions, Inc. (In re Dufrane)
matters of public record may be considered, including pleadings, orders, and other papers filed with the court or records of administrative bodies.
cited
Cited "see"
Nursing Home Pension Fund v. Oracle Corp.
See Branch v. Tunnell, 14 F.3d 449 (9th Cir.1994), cert denied, 512 U.S. 1219 , 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Autodesk, Inc. Securities Litigation
See Branch v. Tunnell, 14 F.3d 449, 454 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1219 , 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pooley v. National Hole-In-One Ass'n
See Branch v. Tunnell, 14 F.3d 449, 453 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied 512 U.S. 1219 , 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994) (documents whose contents are alleged in a complaint and whose authenticity no party questions, but which are not physically attached to the pleading, may be considered in ruling on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss).
cited
Cited "see"
Porter v. Charter Medical Corp.
See FDIC v. Shrader & York, 991 F.2d 216, 220 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1219 , 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sung Jin Kim
See Branch v. Tunnell, 14 F.3d 449, 456 (9th Cir.) (stating that a Supreme Court decision overrules Ninth Circuit precedent if it undermines the circuit decision and is “closely on point”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. John Henderson, Jr.
See FDIC v. Shrader & York, 991 F.2d 216, 219-20 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
Dubisar-Dewberry v. Folmar
See Branch v. Tunnell, 14 F.3d 449, 453-54 (9th Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994); Romani v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, 929 F.2d 875 , 879 n. 3 (1st Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marion G. Robertson and Americans for Robertson, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission
See Federal Election Comm’n v. NRA Political Victory Fund, 6 F.3d 821, 826-27 (D.C.Cir.1993), cert. granted, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 2703 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994), cert. dismissed, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 537 , 130 L.Ed.2d 439 (1995). 5 The Commission, however, in an effort to avoid the effect of our opinion, voted on December 1, 1993, to ratify its past “actions in audits of publicly funded presidential campaigns,” including this case, without the presence of the two ex officio members.
discussed
Cited "see"
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION v. John HENDERSON, Jr
See FDIC v. Shrader & York, 991 F.2d 216, 219-20 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994). 2 These loans, which totaled over $82 million, are as follows, with claimed damages caused by default in parentheses: $20 million by Home to Secame Associates ($9.64 million); $17 million by Home and Southland to Phil Mockford ($6.88 million); $11.2 million by Home and Southland to S.R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rodriguez v. Loudeye Corp.
See, e.g., Branch v. Tunnell, 14 F.3d 449, 453-54 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1219 , 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994); overruled on other grounds by Galbraith v. County of Santa Clara, 307 F.3d 1119 (9th Cir.2002); In re Stac Elecs.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Franks v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc.
See e.g., Branch v. Tunnell, 14 F.3d 449, 453-54 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1219 , 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994); Venture Assocs. v. Zenith Data Sys., 987 F.2d 429, 431 (7th Cir.1993); Pension Benefit Guar.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Crisp
Western Mining Council v. Watt, 643 F.2d 618, 624 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1031 , 102 S.Ct. 567 , 70 L.Ed.2d 474 (1981); see also Branch v. Tunnell, 14 F.3d 449, 453 (9th Cir.1994) (“[A] document is not ‘outside’ the complaint if the complaint specifically refers to the document and if its authenticity is not questioned.”), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1219 , 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Waslow v. Grant Thornton LLP (In Re Jack Greenberg, Inc.)
Compare Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. O’Melveny & Meyers, supra, 969 F.2d at 751 & n. 8 (concluding that defendant law firm was not entitled to invoke estoppel defense of imputation because it was not an innocent third party), Comeau v. Rupp, 810 F.Supp. 1127, 1142 (D.Kan.1992) (reasoning there was no inequity in withdrawing the imputation defense from the auditor defendant’s “litigation arsenal” because "this is not a case where a wholly innocent party will be called upon to pay for a loss caused by another”), and Merin v. Yegen Holdings Corp. (In re Liquidation of Integr…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barapind v. Reno
Durning v. First Boston Corp., 815 F.2d 1265, 1267 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, sub nom., Wyoming Community Development Authority v. Durning, 484 U.S. 944 , 108 S.Ct. 330 , 98 L.Ed.2d 358 (1987); see also Branch v. Tunnell, 14 F.3d 449, 453 (9th Cir.) “document is not ‘outside’ the complaint if the complaint specifically refers to the document and if its authenticity is not questioned.”), cer t. denied, 512 U.S. 1219 , 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gaylord Entertainment Co. v. Thompson
(2×)
See, e.g., Branch v. Tunnell, 14 F.3d 449, 453-54 (9th Cir.1994) (“documents whose contents are alleged in a complaint and whose authenticity no party questions, but which are not physically attached to the pleading, may be considered”), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1219 , 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994); Pension Benefit Guar.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hockey v. Medhekar
The court may also consider documents incorporated by reference, Kramer v. Time Warner, Inc., 937 F.2d 767, 773 (2d Cir.1991); see also Townsend v. Columbia Operations, 667 F.2d 844, 848 (9th Cir.1982), and documents “whose contents are alleged in the complaint and whose authenticity no party questions,” Branch v. Tunnell, 14 F.3d 449, 453-54 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1219 , 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994); see also In re Stac Electronics Sec.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vizenor v. Babbitt
See also Branch v. Tunnell, 14 F.3d 449, 453-54 (9th Cir.1994), ce rt. denied, -U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994); Romani v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, 929 F.2d 875 , 879 n. 3 (1st Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Hunter Environmental Services, Inc. Securities Litigation
See, e.g., Branch v. Tunnell, 14 F.3d 449, 453-54 (9th Cir.) (holding that a court could consider the full text of partially quoted materials to decide if the plaintiff could possible prove its claim), cert. denied, —U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994); Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. White Consol.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arrington v. Dickerson
(2×)
The court also finds persuasive the Seventh Circuit’s reasoning that “[a] civil rights complaint must outline a violation of the constitution or a federal statute and connect the violation to the ‘named defendants.’ ” Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 672 (7th Cir.1992) (quoting Brownlee v. Conine, 957 F.2d 353, 354 (7th Cir.1992)); see also Branch v. Tunnell, 937 F.2d 1382, 1386 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994) (Where subjective intent is an element of a plaintiffs claim, “bare allegations of improper purpose are insufficien…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
BAUCHMAN, BY AND THROUGH BAUCHMAN v. West High
See also Branch v. Tunnell, 14 F.3d 449, 451 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bauchman ex rel. Bauchman v. West High School
See also Branch v. Tunnell, 14 F.3d 449, 451 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gasner v. County of Dinwiddie
See, e.g., Branch v. Tunnell, 14 F.3d 449, 453-54 (9th Cir.) (“documents whose contents are alleged in a complaint and whose authenticity no party questions, but which are not physically attached to the pleading, may be considered”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994); Watterson v. Page, 987 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1993) (recognizing narrow exception to conversion rule for documents the authenticity of which are not disputed by the parties, official public records, documents central to the plaintiffs’ claim and documents sufficiently referred to in the complai…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
George WICKS, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MISSISSIPPI STATE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, Et Al., Defendants, Hazel Cook, Defendant-Appellant
See also Branch v. Tunnell, 14 F.3d 449 (9th Cir.) (holding that a panel is bound by prior panel’s adoption of heightened pleading because Leatherman did not undermine that precedent), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph M. Schultea, Sr. v. David Robert Wood, David Robert Wood, Homer Ford, W.F. \Slim\" Plagens
See In re Dyke, 943 F.2d 1435, 1442 (5th Cir.1991) ("In this circuit, one panel may not overrule the decision — right or wrong — of a prior panel, absent en banc reconsideration or a superseding decision of the Supreme Court."); see also Branch v. Tunnell, 14 F.3d 449, 456-57 (9th Cir.) (panel bound by prior panel’s adoption of the heightened pleading standard because Leatherman did not undermine that precedent), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994); Kimberlin v. Quinlan, 6 F.3d 789 , 794 n. 9 (D.C.Cir.1993) (holding that because Leather-man "did not address he…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Todd v. Hawk
See, e.g., Branch v. Tunnell, 14 F.3d 449, 457 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994); Kimberlin v. Quinlan, 6 F.3d 789, 794 (D.C.Cir.1993), petition for cert. filed, 63 U.S.L.W. 3009 (U.S. June 22, 1994) (No. 2068); Idoux v. Lamar University System, 828 F.Supp. 1252 , 1256-57 n. 2 (E.D.Tex.1993); McDonald v. City of Freeport, Tex., 834 F.Supp. 921, 929 (S.D.Tex.1993).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Benson
See, e.g., F.D.I.C. v. Shrader & York, 991 F.2d 216, 220-27 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994); Howse, 736 F.Supp. at 1440 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Branch
v.
Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of the Bureau of Land Management
v.
Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of the Bureau of Land Management
No. 93-1327.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 20, 1994.
Cited by 109 opinions | Published
Citer courts: C.D. California (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.