Brennan v. Sw. Airlines, 140 F.3d 849 (9th Cir. 1998). · Go Syfert
Brennan v. Sw. Airlines, 140 F.3d 849 (9th Cir. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mikulski v. Centerior Energy Corporation (ca1, 2006-01-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Mikulski v. Centerior Energy Corporation
1st Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brennan v. Southwest Airlines Co., 134 F.3d 1405, 1409 , amended without substantive change, 140 F.3d 849 (9th Cir.1998) (in collecting excise tax from passengers, airlines act as agents for the IRS); Sigmon v. Southwest Airlines Co., 110 F.3d 1200, 1203 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 950 , 118 S.Ct. 370 , 139 L.Ed.2d 288 (1997) (citing 26 U.S.C. § 4291 and Kaucky v. Southwest Airlines Co., 109 F.3d 349 (7th Cir.1997) (airlines act as government agents in collecting airline ticket excise taxes)); Kaucky, 109 F.3d at 351-52 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 949 , 118 S.Ct. 368 , 139 L…
discussed Cited "see" Mikulski v. Centerior Energy Corp. (2×)
6th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brennan v. Southwest Airlines Co., 134 F.3d 1405, 1409 , amended without substantive change, 140 F.3d 849 (9th Cir.1998) (in collecting excise tax from passengers, airlines act as agents for the IRS); Sigmon v. Southwest Airlines Co., 110 F.3d 1200, 1203 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 522 U.S. 950 , 118 S.Ct. 370 , 139 L.Ed.2d 288 (1997) (citing 26 U.S.C. § 4291 and Kaucky v. Southwest Airlines Co., 109 F.3d 349 (7th Cir.1997) (airlines act as government agents in collecting airline ticket excise taxes)); Kaucky, 109 F.3d at 351-52 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 522 U.S. 949 , 118 S.Ct. 368 , 139 L…
cited Cited "see" Arco Environmental Remediation, L.L.C. v. Department Of Health And Environmental Quality Of The State Of Montana
9th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brennan v. Southwest Airlines Co., 134 F.3d 1405, 1409 (9th Cir.), amended by, 140 F.3d 849 (9th Cir. 1998).
cited Cited "see" ARCO Environmental Remediation, L.L.C. v. Department of Health & Environmental Quality
9th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brennan v. Southwest Airlines Co., 134 F.3d 1405, 1409 (9th Cir.), amended by, 140 F.3d 849 (9th Cir.1998).
discussed Cited "see" Thiele v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
S.D. Cal. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brennan v. Southwest Airlines Co., 134 F.3d 1405 , 1410 n. 5 (9th Cir.), amended on other grounds, 140 F.3d 849 (9th Cir.1998); United States v. Esparza-Ponce, 7 F.Supp.2d 1084, 1092 (S.D.Cal.1998) (Rhoades, J.).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Esparza-Ponce (2×)
S.D. Cal. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brennan v. Southwest Airlines Co., No. 96-17053, 140 F.3d 849 , 1998 WL 162163 , at *3 n. 5 (9th Cir. Apr.9, 1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Margaret BRENNAN Michael Manders Ann Dichov
v.
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES Alaska Airlines Corporation United Air Lines Corporation
No. 96-17053.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Apr 9, 1998.
140 F.3d 849
Cited by 18 opinions  |  Published

ORDER

The Opinion filed on January 28,1988, slip op. 847 [134 F.3d 1405], is amended as follows:

1. On page 856, line 8 [134 F.3d at 1410, line 7], change “See ” to “Cf.”
2. On page 856, line 10 [134 F.3d at 1410, line 10], after “should read the” insert “identical language of a companion”.
3. On page 856, line 12 [134 F.3d at 1410, line 14], delete “See id.”
4. On page 856, line 16 [134 F.3d at 1410, line 20], add “Cf.” before “Id.” and insert “in a companion statute” after “(holding that”.

The panel votes to deny appellants’ petition for rehearing. Judge T.G. Nelson votes to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc and Judge Goodwin and Judge Rhoades so recommend.

The full court has been advised of the en bane suggestion and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it.

With the exception of the amendments listed above, the petition for rehearing is DE[*850] NIED and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is REJECTED.