Blue Circle, Inc. v. Georgia Dep't of Revenue, 543 U.S. 815 (2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Blue Circle, Inc. v. Georgia Dep't of Revenue, 543 U.S. 815 (2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: McCRACKEN AND AMICK, INC. v. Perdue (ncctapp, 2009-12-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" McCRACKEN AND AMICK, INC. v. Perdue
N.C. Ct. App. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Artichoke Joe’s California Grand Casino v. Norton, 353 F.3d 712 , 719 n.10 (9th Cir. 2003) [hereinafter Artichoke Joe’s II] (declining to *484 address whether tribe was necessary party to challenge to the validity of tribal-state gaming compacts because the issue was “raised only in an amicus brief’), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 815 , 51, 160 L.
cited Cited "see" Collins v. Department of Interior
D.D.C. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Artichoke Joe’s v. Norton, 353 F.3d 712 , 736 (9th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 815 , 125 S.Ct. 51 , 160 L.Ed.2d 20 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Shaw v. Life Insurance Co. of North America
C.D. Cal. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
Where such discretion is vested in the administrator, “a district court may review the administrator’s determinations only for an abuse of discretion.” Taft v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y, 9 F.3d 1469 , 1471 n. 2 (9th Cir.1994); see also Nord v. Black & Decker Disability Plan, 356 F.3d 1008, 1010 (9th Cir.2004) (“[WJhere, as here, a plan administrator has ‘discretionary authority to determine eligibility for benefits,’ we review the benefits decision for abuse of discretion”), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 815 , 125 S.Ct. 62 , 160 L.Ed.2d 20 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lundquist v. Continental Casualty Co.
C.D. Cal. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
Tremain v. Bell Industries, Inc., 196 F.3d 970, 976 (9th Cir.1999); see also Nord v. Black & Decker Disability Plan, 356 F.3d 1008, 1010 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. - — , 125 S.Ct. 62 , 160 L.Ed.2d 20 (2004) (same); Alford v. DCH Foundation Group Long-Term Disability Plan, 311 F.3d 955, 957 (9th Cir.2002) (same).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Horn v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
N.D. Cal. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
Moreover, if such a-conflict exists, the court must further distinguish between the mere appearance of a conflict of interest, which .arises by virtue of the administrator’s “economic stake in the benefit decision which it makes,” and a conflict that actually “caused a breach of the administrator’s fiduciary duty to the beneficiary.” Atwood v. Newmont Gold Co., Inc., 45 F.3d 1317, 1322-23 (9th Cir.1995); see also Nord v. Black & Decker Disability Plan, 356 F.3d 1008, 1010 (9th Cir.), cert. denied,- — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 62 , 160 L.Ed.2d 20 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Blue Circle, Inc.
v.
Georgia Department of Revenue
03-1603.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 2004.
543 U.S. 815
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published

543 U.S. 815

BLUE CIRCLE, INC.
v.
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ET AL.

No. 03-1603.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 4, 2004.

1

Ct. App. Ga. Certiorari denied.