Dunn v. Campbell, 134 S.E.2d 20 (Ga. 1963). · Go Syfert
Dunn v. Campbell, 134 S.E.2d 20 (Ga. 1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hillhouse (gactapp, 1974-04-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hillhouse (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1974 · confidence medium
Brown v. Cobb County, 212 Ga. 172, 175 ( 91 SE2d 516 ); McCallum v. Quarles, 214 Ga. 192 , supra; Rowan v. Herring, 214 Ga. 370, 374 ( 105 SE2d 29 ); Pinkard v. Mendel, 216 Ga. 487, 490 ( 117 SE2d 336 ); Henderson v. Alverson, 217 Ga. 541, 542 ( 123 SE2d 721 ); Dunn v. Campbell, 219 Ga. 412, 415 ( 134 SE2d 20 ); Milton Frank Allen Pubs. v. Ga. Assn. of Petroleum Retailers, 219 Ga. 665, 671 ( 135 SE2d 330 ); Salomon v. Central of Ga. R.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) LaSalle National Insurance v. Popham (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1972 · confidence medium
Brown v. Cobb County, 212 Ga. 172, 175 ( 91 SE2d 516 ); McCallum v. Quarles, 214 Ga. 192 , supra; Rowan v. Herring, 214 Ga. 370, 374 ( 105 SE2d 29 ); Pinkard v. Mendel, 216 Ga. 487, 490 ( 117 SE2d 336 ); Henderson v. Alverson, 217 Ga. 541, 542 ( 123 SE2d 721 ); Dunn v. Campbell, 219 Ga. 412, 415 ( 134 SE2d 20 ); Milton Frank Allen Pubs. v. Ga. Assn. of Petroleum Retailers, 219 Ga. 665, 671 ( 135 SE2d 330 ); Salomon v. Central of Ga. R.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Ditmyer v. American Liberty Insurance (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1968 · confidence medium
Co., 216 Ga. 547, 548 (2) ( 117 SE2d 897 ); Dunn v. Campbell, 219 Ga. 412, 415 ( 134 SE2d 20 ); Milton Frank Allen Publications v. Ga. Assn. of Petroleum Retailers, 219 Ga. 665, 670 (1a) ( 135 SE2d 330 ); American Mut.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Moody (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1967 · confidence medium
Co., 216 Ga. 547 (2) ( 117 SE2d 897 ); Dunn v. Campbell, 219 Ga. 412, 414-415 ( 134 SE2d 20 ).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) American Mutual Insurance v. Aderholt
Ga. Ct. App. · 1966 · confidence medium
Co., 216 Ga. 547, 548 (2) ( 117 SE2d 897 ); Dunn v. Campbell, 219 Ga. 412, 415 ( 134 SE2d 20 ); Milton Frank Allen Publications v. Georgia Assn, of Petroleum Retailers, 219 Ga. 665, 670 (1a) ( 135 SE2d 330 ).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Walker v. Barrett
Ga. Ct. App. · 1965 · confidence medium
Co., 216 Ga. 547, 548 ( 117 SE2d 897 ); Dunn v. Campbell, 219 Ga. 412, 414 ( 134 SE2d 20 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DUNN
v.
CAMPBELL, Commissioner of Agriculture
22206.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Nov 7, 1963.
134 S.E.2d 20
Schreiber & Rozier, for plaintiff in error., Eugene Cook, Attorney General, G. Hughel Harrison, Leroy C. Hobbs, Assistant Attorneys General, contra.
Quillian.
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published

Lead Opinion

Per Curiam.

The second ground of general demurrer is that the petition does- not set forth a valid cause of action for declaratory judgment. This court has held in full-bench cases: “While, under Ga. L. 1959, p. 236, amending the Declaratory Judgments Act (Ga. L. 1945, p. 137; Code Ann. § 110-1101 et seq.), by adding thereto Section 1(c), one is not precluded from obtaining relief by declaratory judgment merely because the complaining party has other adequate legal or equitable remedy or remedies, yet ‘The object of the declaratory judgment is to permit determination of a controversy before obligations are repudiated or[*415] rights are violated.’ Rowan v. Herring, 214 Ga. 370, 374 (105 SE2d 29), and cases there cited. And where, as here, the petition shows that the rights of the parties have already accrued and no facts or circumstances are alleged which show that an adjudication of the plaintiffs’ rights is necessary in order to relieve the plaintiffs from the risk of taking any future undirected action incident to their rights, which action without direction would jeopardize their interests, the petition fails to state a cause of action for declaratory judgment.” Pinkard v. Mendel, 216 Ga. 487, 490 (2) (117 SE2d 336); State Hwy. Dept. v. Ga. Southern &c. R. Co., 216 Ga. 547 (2) (117 SE2d 897). The present suit is a simple statutory action for the collection of an assessment instituted under and as provided by the Georgia Agricultural Commodities Promotion Act (Ga. L. 1961, pp. 301, 348, Section 20; Code Ann. § 5-2920). In the opinion of the court it falls squarely within the rule above stated and hence does not set forth cause for a declaratory judgment.

The trial judge erred in overruling the defendant’s demurrer to the petition.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Quillian, J., who dissents.

Dissent

Quillian, Justice,

dissenting. The foregoing opinion does not express my views. I think the petition set forth a cause for declaratory judgment and was not subject to demurrer for any of the reasons assigned.