green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
7.0 score
“he other three cards were properly authenticated by testimony that the signer had returned the card to the union agent, thus adopting as his own the signature thereon.”
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
National Labor Relations Board v. General Wood Preserving Company Burke-Parsons Bowlby
he other three cards were properly authenticated by testimony that the signer had returned the card to the union agent, thus adopting as his own the signature thereon.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Touche Ross & Co.
an award of is, in the first instance, compensatory ...
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Tome
personal wrongdoings" of defendant should be considered in evaluating whether an award of prejudgment interest is in accord with "fundamental fairness
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,901 Louis Osofsky v. George C. Zipf, Rose Udoff v. Babcock & Wilcox Company
Thus, in the instant case, where the misleading aspect of the solicitation does relate to the terms of the merger, we believe, to use the language of Mills, 396 U.S. at 388 , 90 S.Ct. at 623 , that “the district court might appropriately order an accounting to ensure that the shareholders receive the value that was represented as coming to them.” This is precisely what then District Judge Mansfield did in Norte & Co. v. Huffines, 288 F.Supp. 855, 864 (S.D.N.Y.1968), aff’d in relevant part, modified in part, 416 F.2d 1189, 1191 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 989 , 90 S.Ct. 1121 , …
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Great American Industries
See Norte & Co. v. Huffines, 288 F.Supp. 855 , 858 n. 2 (S.D.N.Y.1968), aff'd in part and remanded in part, 416 F.2d 1189 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 989 , 90 S.Ct. 1121 , 25 L.Ed.2d 396 (1970). 46 Moreover, for those Chenango shareholders who participated in the exchange of stock, the pre-merger price of the GAI stock lost most of its significance.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Great American Industries, Inc.
See Norte & Co. v. Huffines, 288 F.Supp. 855, 858 n. 2 (S.D.N.Y.1968), aff'd in part and remanded in part, 416 F.2d 1189 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 989 , 90 S.Ct. 1121 , 25 L.Ed.2d 396 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Delaune v. Saint Marine Transportation Co.
See generally Ryals v. Estelle, 661 F.2d 904, 906 (5th Cir. Nov. 1981) (per curiam). 43 . 419 F.2d 230, 236 (5th Cir.), reh'g en banc denied, 419 F.2d 238 (5th Cir.1969) (per curiam) (7-6), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 989 , 90 S.Ct. 1120 , 25 L.Ed.2d 396 (1970), overruled on other grounds in Crown Zellerbach Corp. v. Ingram Industries, Inc., 783 F.2d 1296 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 821 , 107 S.Ct. 87 , 93 L.Ed.2d 40 (1986). 44 . 433 So.2d 281, 288 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 440 So.2d 731 (La.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1079 , 104 S.Ct. 1442 , 79 L.Ed.2d 762 (1984). 45 .
cited
Cited "see"
China Union Lines, Limited and International Union Maritime Insurance Company, Limited, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. American Marine Underwriters, Inc., Calvert Fire Insurance Co., Canadian Marine Underwriters Limited, and Cna Assurance Company, Inc., Cna Assurance Company, Inc., American Marine Underwriters, Inc., and Calvert Fire Insurance Co., Defendants-Third Party Calvert Fire Insurance Co., Defendant-Third Party v. I.R. Posgate and Other Underwriters at Lloyd's Subscribing to Reinsurance Contract \Ghl No. 1039-61\"
See Norte & Co. v. Huffines, 416 F.2d 1189, 1192 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 989 , 90 S.Ct. 1121 , 25 L.Ed.2d 396 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
China Union Lines, Ltd. v. American Marine Underwriters, Inc.
See Norte & Co. v. Huffines, 416 F.2d 1189, 1192 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 989 , 90 S.Ct. 1121 , 25 L.Ed.2d 396 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Crown Zellerbach Corporation v. Ingram Industries, Inc.
The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. 1 Olympic Towing Corp. v. Nebel Towing Co., Inc., 419 F.2d 230 , 1969 A.M.C. 1571 (5th Cir.1969) cert. denied, 397 U.S. 989 , 90 S.Ct. 1120 , 25 L.Ed.2d 396 (1970); see id., 419 F.2d at 238 (Brown, C.J., dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc) 2 Maryland Casualty Co. v. Cushing, 347 U.S. 409 , 74 S.Ct. 608 , 98 L.Ed. 806 , 1954 A.M.C. 837 (1954) * Only this issue has precedential value.
cited
Cited "see"
Steelmet, Inc. v. Caribe Towing Corp.
See Olympic Towing Corp. v. Nebel Towing Co., 419 F.2d 230, 236-37 (5th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 989 , 90 S.Ct. 1120 , 25 L.Ed.2d 396 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Steelmet, Inc. v. Caribe Towing Corp.
See Olympic Towing Corp. v. Nebel Towing Co., 419 F.2d 230, 236-37 (5th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 989 , 90 S.Ct. 1120 , 25 L.Ed.2d 396 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Crown Zellerbach Corp. v. Ingram Industries, Inc.
Olympic Towing Corp. v. Nebel Towing Co., Inc., 419 F.2d 230 , 1969 A.M.C. 1571 (5th Cir. 1969) cert, denied, 397 U.S. 989 , 90 S.Ct. 1120 , 25 L.Ed.2d 396 (1970); see id., 419 F.2d at 238 (Brown, C.J., dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc). .
cited
Cited "see"
Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co.
See Norte & Co. v. Huffines, 416 F.2d 1189, 1191 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 989 , 90 S.Ct. 1121 , 25 L.Ed.2d 396 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co.
See Norte & Co. v. Huffines, 416 F.2d 1189, 1191 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 989 , 90 S.Ct. 1121 , 25 L.Ed.2d 396 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Allied Chemical Corp. v. Hess Tankship Co.
See Olympic Towing Corporation v. Nebel Towing Company, 419 F.2d 230, 233-34 (5 Cir. 1969), cert. den’d, 397 U.S. 989 , 90 S.Ct. 1120 , 25 L.Ed.2d 396 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Morgan v. Iowa Department of Public Safety
See Kesler v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 1 Cal.3d 74 , 81 Cal.Rptr. 348 , 459 P.2d 900 , cert. den. 397 U.S. 989 , 90 S.Ct. 1121 , 25 L.Ed.2d 396 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,347 Henry T. Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc.
Compare Blau v. Lehman, 368 U.S. 403 , 82 S.Ct. 451 , with Norte & Co. v. Huffines, 416 F.2d 1189 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied Muscat v. Norte & Co., 397 U.S. 989 , 90 S.Ct. 1121 , 25 L.Ed.2d 396 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kesler
v.
Department of Motor Vehicles of California
v.
Department of Motor Vehicles of California
No. 1133.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 23, 1970.
Hyman Gold for petitioner.
Cited by 134 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.